[dragnet2]

Evidently it is become part of Trump sleaze now is to declare guilt

Many you're ethically challenged nate. I didn't say he was guilty in this latest Cruz incident/story/report. I never declared that regarding this story.

Here is what I said below nate.

"Hey nate, I keep hearing the Cruz folks repeat that line, “there is no evidence whatsoever here”. Just like the good old days with the Clinton dynasty".

In fact nate, here is what I stated in #4 below.

"This may or may not be true, I have no idea, but I never did like Levin or Beck...and a few others....No surprises here".

And you speak of sleaze?

[nathanbedford]

The Trump sleaze oozes onward down another path. In addition to declaring guilt by historic analogy we are now subjected to double speak and, worse, the subjective likes or dislikes of dragnet 2:

"This may or may not be true, I have no idea, but I never did like Levin or Beck...and a few others....No surprises here".

No surprise here? What surprise could the reader possibly infer except the guilt of Levin or Beck or others?

When dragnet 2 doesn't like you… You are declared guilty with double speak which concedes in one breath that it "may not be true" but in the next breath "no surprises here," meaning there can be no surprise because the charges must be true.

[MaxistheBest]

“The Trump sleaze oozes onward down another path.”

You just earned a badge of honor in my book :) Nothing like getting the old Colonel fired up.