"This may or may not be true, I have no idea, but I never did like Levin or Beck...and a few others....No surprises here".
No surprise here? What surprise could the reader possibly infer except the guilt of Levin or Beck or others?
When dragnet 2 doesn't like you… You are declared guilty with double speak which concedes in one breath that it "may not be true" but in the next breath "no surprises here," meaning there can be no surprise because the charges must be true.
The reader can infer anything they want. I have no control over you or what anyone think. No? But I certainly did not declare anyone "guilty" as you clearly stated. You can read right nate?
Btw, there are clear patterns with Cruz of previously unknown information revealed and other incidents. Of course you'll want me to replay this election for you. You can do that yourself nate. And by the way, I'm not intimidated or impressed by your civil war getup or your wordy speech like comments. Just so we understand each other.
Your candidate’s campaign is running a radio ad insinuating the Trump would have sex with his daughter. How do you feel about your guy now Colonel ?
Principled is not a word I would use to describe him.
“He lied last night on national TV,claimed he is the only one of the remaining 4 that does not support the Iranian nuke deal.
Trump spoke at an anti-nuke deal rally that Cruz also spoke at only minutes apart. Plus I know Ted has heard Trump position at the debates.
But hears the kicker, Cruz not only voted for the Corker Bill he cosponsored it.”
Took this from another post:
Your “principled” man just can’t stop lying !!
I would run from that kind of endorsement, it's just shy of being endorsed by the John Birch Society in the days after Buckley outed them. No it's actually worse than that; it's incomprehensible you don't find it bizarre in the least and is quite the self condemnation.