Mister Nye completely abandons the scientific method (perhaps he never learned it.)
Global warming is based on climate models, which are low confidence as they have so many variables and they are beclouded with so much uncertainty associated with input assumptions.
That's it. Outputs of highly uncertain models qualify as an observation to MISTER Nye.
Another little thing.
If someone had dire warnings based on vague modeling, would it not be prudent to invite opposing views, and work to learn just why you might be in error?
.
[[If someone had dire warnings based on vague modeling, would it not be prudent to invite opposing views, and work to learn just why you might be in error? ]]
Not when you have a muilti-Trillion dollar scam to advance- no- Facts be damned
What I want to know- is- 1: do their models figure in the FACT that man’s CO2 amounts to just 0.00136% of our atmosphere, (I want to see the actual impact that 0.00136% of our atmosphere would have and how much actual escaping heat it captures and holds in the atmosphere in order to cause global climate change- I’m betting 0.00136% of our atmosphere is not capable of holding hardly any heat) and
2: How do they explain that climates always change/get wrmer first- then 800 years later or more, CO2 rises IF CO2 is the driver/cause of climate change? and finally
3: Since it’s claimed that CO2 causes the earth to warm, why was there no warming for 20 years despite man producing more CO2?