But he was referring to a Jewish tradition, identifying the house as having sacrificed their own personal lamb, the choicest male belonging to the house hold (sometimes more of a pet than just livestock) with proof of the sacrifice identified by the smearing of the blood. We aren’t ignorant of the Bible, sir, and his interpretation as believed most popularly by a small section of Christians has no place in this conversation about the Jewish tradition. I have nothing more to say on this.
That does not change the fact that Kasich correctly conveyed a Christian belief. He might have picked a better setting, but he is correct.
I read the entire article and Kasich was correct on everything about both Christian doctrine and Joseph’s most important statement in Genesis.