you people have no limits do you?
Trump gets excoriated for repeating the p-word at a rally of adults but we’re supposed to look the other way when Cruz discusses, on TV with his two young daughters present, watching porn?
Oh, no, the “Face of God” candidate doesn’t get a pass on this one.
This is not the Victorian Age and FR is not a Sanctuary.
The fact that Ted Cruz argued the case to the Appellate level and considering taking his “anti-sexual device case” (omitted the “D” word for virgin eyes) to The Supreme Court of the United States speaks volumes.
Humor aside, his argument that the utilization of such devices would condone “engaging in consensual adult incest or bigamy” is an absurd argument.
It’s a huge error for a master debater like Cruz to present to the court. And a classic example of the slippery slope fallacy -. A slippery slope argument proposes that a relatively small first step leads to a chain of related events culminating in some significant (usually negative) effect.
What? Posting a video of Cruz from his CNN family town hall??
He likes to tell the story - there are other clips of him telling it.
The gutter is a hundred feet above where this campaign is....
I don't know what you mean by that comment. FWIW, my objection would be Senator Cruz speaking for Sandra Day O'Conner's reaction to watching porn as part of a court case. I'd wonder why the justices didn't first watch it in private, and why Ted Cruz was in the room at her first viewing.