[dynoman]

You didn’t understand. With less candidates Trump would have had more votes, those votes would have been more proportional.

But all that is aside from the problem with 60,000 people supposedly supporting Cruz 100%.

I look forward to you defending the position there was no corruption in Colorado.

[D-fendr]

>>>With less candidates Trump would have had more votes, those votes would have been more proportional.

No.. proportionate is according to the proportion of votes. It’s not hard math.

>> problem with 60,000 people supposedly supporting Cruz 100%.

That would be another problem with math. Read the rules again. It doesn’t take 100% of the vote to elect a delegate.

[D-fendr]

The question is still: In state’s with primaries, should the number of delegates for each candidate be equal to the proportion of votes for the candidate?

Would that be fair - in your opinion.

[cornfedcowboy]

But all that is aside from the problem with 60,000 people supposedly supporting Cruz 100%.

---

Ummm, small states such as Florida and Ohio have winner take all. Did 100% of Floridians vote for Trump? Geesh.