He is saying this is totally a religious issue, maybe to add to the fire against Christians. I think it is more a right to privacy issue and a safety issue, especially for women and girls.
There are rumors he bats for the other team...
Only in the demented minds of leftists and SJWs is the bathroom accommodations for 0.00001 percent of the population-who might very well be suffering from a mental illness-a civil rights issue.
Not surprising. The major impression I’ve gotten from him is WIMP... just like the rest of the GOPe.
Kashit, the ugly Turdle.
Hey John, shut up and go home already!
The more fuss that is made over this, the more likely that proponents of the bill will be asked for examples of men who masqueraded as women to molest women. And then they will be asked how we should be expected to identify such masquerades.
I believe molestation, or any other propositioning in public restroom areas, is already illegal. No matter what sex the propositioner or the proposee was born as, or may be masquerading as now.
I don’t see any problem with meaning well here. I do see a big problem with enforceability. Statutes have gotten nullified for being unenforceable.
It sounds like he is confusing the two bills that were signed in Mississippi and North Carolina.
That's the story of the GOP over the past 8 years. I believe in conservative ideas BUT . . . . .
It’s not so much a religious issue as it is a matter of privacy. You don’t need to look at what the Bible says to analyze this issue.
The guy is a fraud. He was waiting to see which way the wind blew on this then comes out with his statement.
John Kasich supports giving perverts access to little girls
keywords: “from everything I know, I haven’t studied it.”
So maybe he would sign it.
Why is this guy a republican?
A real effing Profile in Courage there, eh?
And this retard thinks I’m going to vote for him if he screws over Trump and Cruz for the nomination. Think again, milk boy.
He did get one thing right. Politicians do write too damn many laws. I’d like to vote for a President someday that runs on the promise to repeal useless laws, a lot of laws.
Hard to believe we have arrived at a point where asking men to not use the ladies room is considered controversial.
We all know that Johnnie boy.
The point here is that IT IS uncomfortable for women to have strange men in the bathroom with them. Especially if a man trying to look like a woman.
So why not respect their feelings and keep the dudes in the men's bathrooms.... in the mens bathrooms where they can pee all over the seats to their hearts content and leave a trail of urine out the stall door. Yes, men are pigs and no they don't have to sit down on the urine covered seats to go to the bathroom.
So lets respect the ladies.
Growing up in the 1950’s in Oklahoma. Gas stations usually had a rest room for customer use/access. It was often a one sink, stool and a mirror. We were glad to have access. one at a time unless you took a child with you.
Like all issues, today it seems unnecessary to demand registered rest rooms. If it is a busy place like a movie it is needed to have separate rest rooms. Otherwise it is much ado about nothing. Be glad there is a sink and toilet paper and wait turns.
MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING ... MOO!
God is great, God is good let us thank Him for His many blessings showered upon us daily, in Jesus name, amen.
Evidently, the “moderate” position in the Republican Party is it is perfectly fine for males to wave their weenies in the ladies restroom - in the interest of “tolerance” and “inclusiveness.”
So, who still wants to be a Republican?
Ohio’s “favorite son” is a rudderless, which-way-is-the-wind-blowing moron.