[patlin]

Nothing in those statutes say who is NOT a natural born citizen

THAT'S THE POINT!

Natural born is NOT defined by statutes passed by Congress because Congress ONLY has authority to make citizens through the process of naturalization. Natural born are defined by “nature” hence the term “natural”.

now go read your bible as God set forth the natural order of a child's nationality in the beginning and the nationality follows that of the father, NOT the mother

[Moseley]

“Congress ONLY has authority to make citizens through the process of naturalization. “

Says who?

That’s only your fantasy.

Your crusade hangs on that fantasy.

You just made that up out of the clear blue sky.

For 100 years before the American revolution, the British parliament was using the power of naturalization to define who is a “natural born subject.”

That is the example that the framers followed:

Congress has the power to define “natural born citizen” by statute just as the UK parliament had been doing for at least 100 years before then.

---

Natural born are defined by “nature” hence the term “natural”.

Correct: One can be a NATURAL BORN son or an ADOPTED son by an artificial legal process.

If one is born NATURALLY a citizen, they are a natural born citizen.

If one is an ARTIFICIAL citizen — by a legal process of naturalization — they are a non-natural citizen because they went through a naturalization process.

BTW naturalization takes 5-10 years.

Don’t repeat the utter bullshit that one can be “naturalized at birth” which is complete horse manure.

It takes 5-10 years to be naturalized, including taking the oath of citizenship and being sworn in by a judge.