Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pro-Life Group Blasts Politico & Daily Beast False Reports of Trump Snub
Media research center ^ | 4-7-2016 | Jeff Donetz

Posted on 04/09/2016 9:10:10 AM PDT by Solson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Robert DeLong

Yeah, that’s what we need another candidate threatening to sue anyone at anytime for any reason. No, I’m glad Ted Cruz is not like Donald Trump and sue happy. Politics is a tough business, and the very nature of it leads many politicians to lies and baseless charges. Thankfully, Ted hasn’t stooped to that level, and turns the other cheek. Ted’s actions speak for themselves, no matter how many times Donald lies about him.


21 posted on 04/09/2016 10:38:07 AM PDT by Vanbasten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

You are welcome, and it’s my pleasure. We ALL need to smile a bit in this crazy primary season!


22 posted on 04/09/2016 10:43:53 AM PDT by Vanbasten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: freeangel
This article is about Trump not being invited to a forum he wasn't invited to speak at. It is being used as an unfair smear against Trump.

Is that untrue? Stick to the subject.

23 posted on 04/09/2016 10:52:48 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Solson

Priests for life are anti-Trump. They denounced him for discussing what would happen if American made law making abortion murder. They are not so “pro-life.”


24 posted on 04/09/2016 11:38:13 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vanbasten
Yeah, that’s what we need another candidate threatening to sue anyone at anytime for any reason.

LOL, there is big reason. That being that your word is your honor. Anyone impugning my honor would have to support that attack or pay the consequence. Legal usage of the court system is the peaceful way of refuting allegations against us with absolutely zero evidence to support the allegation.

To not do so is to allow the allegation to be viewed as a reality.

25 posted on 04/09/2016 11:54:15 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

Simply ridiculous. You sound very naive. Have you noticed that there have been many lies told about ALL of the candidates, yet there is only one that has threatened to sue. He hasn’t actually filed suit, but merely threatened. Why do you think that is?

Ted Cruz’s word is his honor, therefore he has no need to sue some idiotic Trumpkin sycophant. It’s a waste of time, money, and effort. You wanna believe it? Knock yourself out. I require more evidence than the word of the National Enquirer.


26 posted on 04/09/2016 12:21:43 PM PDT by Vanbasten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Solson

You’re not supposed to change the title of the article when posting to FR. Messes with search function and makes for duplication.


27 posted on 04/09/2016 1:03:45 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. --George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Solson

To prevent duplication, please do not alter the published headline, thx.


28 posted on 04/09/2016 1:12:25 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

Lol what a tool


29 posted on 04/09/2016 2:36:52 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Solson

Post a crappie story and expect others to prove it. You must be a liberal.


30 posted on 04/09/2016 2:39:50 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Vanbasten
You sound very naïve

That's it, when you have no defense resort to ad hominine attacks. Just like Cruz when he laid the blame of the story at Trump's feet. Your man has no honor, except among thieves perhaps. He even lies about his eligibility. That is why he has his records sealed. Now I understand why Cruz never questioned Obama's sealed records, he was planning the same tactic.

Why did Cruz seal his records?

Where is the Consular Report of Birth Abroad of a citizen of the United States of America? That isn’t something that is made up. It is a requirement. So where is it?

Just the fact that he did seal his records, and that there appears to be no record of this document, should arouse a great deal of suspicion in the people that support him the same as it has in those who do not support him.

But in today's America emotion always triumphs over logic and truth.

Many of those who steadfastly support Cruz were among those screaming foul when the communist side of their masters’ political party placed a foreign born up for the office of President of the United States. But now because they support him, his followers are condemning those who not only support Trump, desperately clinging to the idea that where a person is born doesn’t matter as long as they have at least one American parent. They have absolutely no knowledge that there is more required than just having a single parent be American. They have no interest at all in learning the facts pertaining to the requirements of being legally a natural born American citizen. Emotion as always ranks above facts.

However the actual citizenship of Mr. Cruz as well as whether he can be declared natural born is in question and many constitutional scholars say he is not. He should just unseal his records and show that he was listed as having dual citizenship at birth. It would end it. Unless it doesn’t exist, which of course it doesn't because Canada did not recognize dual citizenship in that era.

So to respond to your juvenile ad hominine attack, no I am not naïve. Nor will I be blinded by emotion to accept that Ted Cruz is eligible, regardless of what some Democrat judge ruled in Pa. Apparently, however, your false narrative that you care about this country and respect the Constitution is as shallow as the person is that you support for President. You see I really could care less that Ted may or may not have had numerous affairs, there are bigger issues with lyin' Ted.

What are you hiding Ted? Oh that's right, you are hiding the fact that you are not who you have convinced people you are. That you will in fact be the second usurper to occupy the White House while you destroy this country for your oligarch masters.

31 posted on 04/09/2016 2:44:01 PM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

So you admit you have no proof. So who’s the tool?


32 posted on 04/09/2016 2:46:06 PM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

Correct I have no proof the article is true and is not a piece of garbage unworthy to line the bottom of a bird cage.


33 posted on 04/09/2016 2:48:10 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Yet you made the claim that it was lies. So you are admitting you are the liar. Okay, just wanted you to admit that pesky little fact.


34 posted on 04/09/2016 3:03:53 PM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

Very Alinsky of you.

But false


35 posted on 04/09/2016 3:09:37 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Oh you know Alinsky better than I, for he commands that lies are fine when the ends justify the means. You already admitted you lied in your post.


36 posted on 04/09/2016 3:15:25 PM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

No I admitted I couldn’t prove your ridiculous post to be true. Nobody can


37 posted on 04/09/2016 3:47:55 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

It wasn’t my post, but surely you are smart enough to recognize that if you can’t prove the post was true you cannot possibly prove they were lies either. Thus, your post was a flat out lie. Own up to it like a man.


38 posted on 04/09/2016 3:53:07 PM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Bookmarked


39 posted on 04/09/2016 5:37:34 PM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

Blah blah blah

Defend the lies all you want. You’ll face judgement in the end.


40 posted on 04/09/2016 5:41:08 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson