Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: circlecity

It is an effort to stir up hatred towards Cruz.


75 posted on 04/07/2016 5:39:23 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Liberals are the Taliban of America, trying to tear down any symbol that they don't like.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Blood of Tyrants
What Cruz said about New Yorkers is equivalent to Romney's statement about the 47% of the U.S. population who are dependent on government handouts or Obama’s statement about “bitter clingers”. However, both Romney and Obama made their statements in closed meetings with donors, whereas Cruz made his statement publicly in an attempt to sway Iowa voters.

The first leg of Cruz's strategy, winning in the South, was unsuccessful in the states east of Texas and Oklahoma. Despite his evangelical background, he seems to do better with Lutheran, Reformed, and charismatic voters than with Baptists and independent Christian church members. This accounts in part for his victories in Iowa and Wisconsin, and his losses in the Southern states.

I don't think Cruz expected to bother with New York in the first place, so his "New York values" remark was the sort of statement he did not think would bite back. He has two bad days ahead: April 19, when New York votes, then April 26, when the five other Northeastern states vote. Were I one of his advisers, I would tell the Texas senator to focus on Nebraska and Indiana, then the Washington and Oregon primaries, in order to change the momentum back for the final Super Tuesday, June 7, when California, New Jersey, Montana, New Mexico, and South Dakota all vote.

106 posted on 04/07/2016 6:26:39 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson