His initial answer was the correct answer. He said that if abortions are illegal, then there should be a consequence for breaking the law, that the woman, too, should be punished.
Then he got politically correct, too, and backed away from it because all the supposed ‘conservative’ candidates and talking heads where ‘aghast’.
So, he would have done far better doubling down with his logic, and calling them to task for their so-called pro-life views.
ANY truthful answer can ONLY be that a woman who arranges the murder of her child is also guilty. That’s just logical.
>> His initial answer was the correct answer <<
So he double-crossed you by withdrawing that initial answer?
Or are the initial answer and the subsequent variations all equally valid?
His initial answer was the correct answer...Then he got politically correct...
Interesting analysis.
How can we tell which answer he actually believes?