Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kevcol

It is impossible for Paul Ryan to be the nominee if the delegates vote to retain rule 40.

Any nominee or winner of the convention must have won 8 states in the most recent primary season.


2 posted on 04/05/2016 10:18:02 AM PDT by xzins (Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

Based on what I’ve read running Ryan will be next to impossible.


5 posted on 04/05/2016 10:20:27 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Rules are for little people.


11 posted on 04/05/2016 10:23:25 AM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
Things that are just wrong
15 posted on 04/05/2016 10:25:08 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

But you just answered your own question, they’ll change whatever rules they want to change if they really decide this is worth using the nuclear option.

Will they? I don’t trust any of them not to. They may figure it’s better to try to retain control than to let Trump win and assuredly lose it.


21 posted on 04/05/2016 10:29:37 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
It is impossible for Paul Ryan to be the nominee if the delegates vote to retain rule 40.

Literally anyone can be the nominee, even under Rule 40. Because after the first ballot, the delegates can vote as they wish. If a majority in 8 or more states then switch to Ryan, he CAN be nominated under Rule 40.

That's my take on it anyway.

22 posted on 04/05/2016 10:29:48 AM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

I guess a question then comes, can a rule be changed between ballots, say between 2 and 3? If there were enough delegates that would vote to change that rule at that point, I suspect some chaos might ensue.

Of course, this would also be electoral suicide. But if there are some things that the Republican establishment is not shy about if they see near term political or financial advantage, chaos and suicide would be right there on the list.


24 posted on 04/05/2016 10:30:52 AM PDT by Border Terrier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson