Posted on 04/02/2016 1:53:01 PM PDT by Lorianne
I have an idea. Send them back to where they belong and then they can fight for their country. (NOT)
Go ask China, Russia, and Middle East countries
It would be more cost effective to give them 480,000 guns and send them home to fight their own revolution.
Try 2 islands in the Aleutians, one for the females, one for the males, so the breed can die off.
O.K.
Saudi Arabia: 100,000
Egypt: 100,000
Kuwait: 50,000
Burain: 50,000
Qatar: 50,000
United Arab Emirates: 50,000
Oman: 40,000
Sudan: 40,000
Next problem.
Then the World can act in solidarity and resettle 26 million Hispanic/Asian ‘refugees’.
Here’s a thought: resettle them in...Syria.
“No Mooslim country can take them, though. Only countries populated with infidels.”
Here’s the source of it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Nikolaus_von_Coudenhove-Kalergi
They should fit neatly into the Vatican City. Calling the pope on line two...
Lord help us Syrians become the new Palestinians, permanently on welfare and used as political leverage against nations the UN doesn’t like.
Easy - settle them in South Korea... put them in Ki=moon's mother's neighborhood... share the joy of giving....
Oh, wait, I know. It's the same number who have already been taken in. ZERO.
Ban Ki moon,
Why do they need to be resettled?
Why cant they live in Syria?
They were born there, they have our money.
WHY DO THEY HAVE TO LEAVE SYRIA YOU ASSWIPE?
480,000 refugees— assuming that half of them are male... means you have 240,000 males. Assuming 1/4 of those are of fighting age... means you have a potential army of 60,000 males if you want to train them. So, send their butts back armed to try to take back their country, if they are ‘freedom fighters,’ and help them win. If they are not of a mind to be “freedom fighters,” then what good would they be as citizens? Why would we want them? Where is the mutual gain?Fact is, they wouldn’t be good at all.
That’s a great idea. Drop them from helicopters.
I hear Asia has tons of room.
That is a great argument. Send them back to their homeland.
My vote send them to hell
What the hell is so hard about that, Go right into Syria, clean it out and settle the “refuges” right back where they came from. I would bet, other than those that are truly ISIS, the rest would prefer to go back to their homelands.
Why? Temporary camps and when the fighting Syria is over, send them back.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.