Skip to comments.
Trump Just Attacked Scott Walker For Being Too Conservative
The Daily Wire ^
| March 31, 2016
| Aaron Bandler
Posted on 03/31/2016 2:40:50 PM PDT by DrewsDad
Real estate mogul Donald Trump continues to reveal his true leftist colors, smearing Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) for being too conservative.
After Walker endorsed Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), Trump unleashed a barrage of leftist talking points against Walker.
"Theres a $2.2 billion deficit and the schools were going begging and everything was going begging because he didnt want to raise taxes cause he was going to run for president," Trump said. "So instead of raising taxes, he cut back on schools, he cut back on highways, he cut back on a lot of things."
Townhall's Guy Benson points out that Trump had previously leveled this smear towards Walker in September, even though The Washington Post, PolitiFact and FactCheck.org all of which are leftist fact-checkers all discredited the attack. Wisconsin had a projected $2.2 billion deficit at one point in 2014, but there was never an actual deficit since state law requires the budget to be balanced, which is what Walker did. Radio host Charlie Sykes confronted Trump on his lie, and Trump put the onus on Time Magazine, even though the magazine got the number from Trump himself.
But what's even more disturbing is that Trump's criticism of Walker suggests that Trump's first instinct is to raise taxes to balance the budget rather than conservative spending, which used to be a cardinal sin in Republican primaries. It's also bad economics, as economist Thomas Sowell explains:
In 1920, when the top tax rate was 73 percent, for people making over $100,000 a year, the federal government collected just over $700 million in income taxes-- and 30 percent of that was paid by people making over $100,000. After a series of tax cuts brought the top rate down to 24 percent, the federal government collected more than a billion dollars in income tax revenue-- and people making over $100,000 a year now paid 65 percent of the taxes.
How could that be? The answer is simple: People behave differently when tax rates are high as compared to when they are low. With low tax rates, they take their money out of tax shelters and put it to work in the economy, benefitting themselves, the economy and government, which collects more money in taxes because incomes rise.
High tax rates which very few people are actually paying, because of tax shelters, do not bring in as much revenue as lower tax rates that people are paying. It was much the same story after tax cuts during the Kennedy administration, the Reagan administration and the Bush Administration.
With conservatives growing increasingly distrustful of Trump, this smear against Walker will only continue to drive a wedge between Trump and conservatives going forward.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 1stcanadiansenator; cruz; cruzcorkerbill; cruzh1b; cruzsoccerball; cruztpa; globalistcruz; moosebitsister; noteligiblecruz; openboarderscruz; scottwalker; scottwalkerpimp; trump; unipartyposter; wi2016; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161 next last
To: fatez
Why do you care if the tRumpsters, and I do not use that term affectionately, “abuse” you. Just laugh at them and give it back. Remember, just like the Donald, they can’t do anything to you.
121
posted on
03/31/2016 3:59:39 PM PDT
by
beandog
(Trump and his supporters have to take the elevator up to even reach the gutter.)
To: DrewsDad; All
Unlike the Federal Government, states cannot print money. Walker had good intentions but after 15 bills that reduced taxes some 2 billion dollars it went past the point of diminishing returns. Yes, we want taxes to be as low as possible, but there are limits.
To: DoughtyOne
Now back to our argument, tomorrow, maybe tomorrow...
123
posted on
03/31/2016 4:00:22 PM PDT
by
fatez
(Ya, well, you know, that's just your opinion man...)
To: fatez
124
posted on
03/31/2016 4:00:48 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
To: beandog
Because I want to persuade them. That is ultimately what I am trying to do. I don’t think it is working, but I have to try :)
125
posted on
03/31/2016 4:01:31 PM PDT
by
fatez
(Ya, well, you know, that's just your opinion man...)
To: Durbin
He only hates the prune faced sanctimonious fraud Cruzbot type.
126
posted on
03/31/2016 4:02:33 PM PDT
by
dforest
(Ted took your money and is laughing all the way to Goldman Sachs)
To: kiryandil
Not well versed, but very familiar with this lie from the left.
To: goodwithagun
“We also need to do a better job at calling out these groups for their hatred and intolerance.”
Absolutely. I think we should use terms like “would-be tyrants,” “enemies of the Constitution,” and “drooling morons.”
“Demanding tolerance is in fact intolerant.”
Yes. It is also logically incoherent and deceptive.
Both sides agree that there are some things that should not be tolerated—molesting children, for instance.
Having established that there *is* a line, it is revealed that we are only arguing about where the line is. When a leftard levels an accusation of intolerance, therefore, he is only saying that his foe refuses to tolerate things that he himself believes should be tolerated.
They do not currently accuse people of intolerance for condemning cannibalism, but they do accuse people for rejecting the proposition that slaying the preborn is wonderful. It’s all a matter of the party line.
These accusations are both invalid and deceptive. Invalid because they have no basis in anything but expediency, and deceptive because they purport to attribute moral deficiency on the basis of philosophical opposition.
They are, in fact, only a form of bullying, and should be rejected at every opportunity.
“They do get a bit pissy when you do that, though.”
We are at a point in history at which physical courage will be required if we are to remain a free people.
“Another favorite of mine with a lib in law is to point out the lack of diversity in same sex marriage.”
I like to call it “sodomite play-pretend marriage.”
“Having two moms or two dads is the opposite of diverse. True diversity is having one of each.”
True, but my take on diversity is that “diversity is where nations go to die.” Your example excepted, of course.
Olofaosh
128
posted on
03/31/2016 4:06:45 PM PDT
by
dsc
(Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
To: DoughtyOne
"See anyone dropping Trump because of it?" Doesn't it make you wonder why?
129
posted on
03/31/2016 4:07:10 PM PDT
by
mlo
To: fatez
And then there is always the write-in candidate which we are allowed to do here. I don’t envy those of you in swing states on this one, it will be a difficult decision for many.
If I had some sort of record to look at regarding Trump that helped to me to believe that he would act in a consistent many across time, that would be a different matter. But regardless of being a Cruz supporter (which I have not been from the beginning), I just don’t see any evidence that I can take Trump at his word. The biggest contributor to my decision has been Trump’s vulgar remarks and immature taunting of his fellow candidates. I find it hard to get past that kind of behavior.
In the beginning, I was glad to have Trump in the race because he put the spotlight on all of the candidates by being there. I thought that was a good thing for everyone. Now that the field is down to 3, he just seems to get more shrill and obnoxious. And reminds me more of Obama each and everyday. This abortion stuff over the last few days sealed my decision, those kinds of flip flops aren’t acceptable to me.
130
posted on
03/31/2016 4:08:49 PM PDT
by
CityCenter
(Suz for Cruz)
To: T. P. Pole
“I am in agreement there. He clearly loves the country. But I am keeping an eye out for knifes.”
Always.
131
posted on
03/31/2016 4:10:51 PM PDT
by
dsc
(Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
To: AndyTheBear
I know what you mean and sometimes I cannot read others comments for a day because I get steamed and I don’t want to lose my credibility with my answers...
132
posted on
03/31/2016 4:17:57 PM PDT
by
fatez
(Ya, well, you know, that's just your opinion man...)
To: CityCenter
Yep, I agree...The one thing I will thank Donald Trump for is destroying Jeb Bush’s candidacy...That right there may have saved the country.
133
posted on
03/31/2016 4:22:07 PM PDT
by
fatez
(Ya, well, you know, that's just your opinion man...)
To: RIghtwardHo
Yeah, cause Hillary will be sooooo much better...
134
posted on
03/31/2016 4:23:21 PM PDT
by
Crusher138
("Then conquer we must, for our cause it is just")
To: dforest; Durbin
He only hates the prune faced sanctimonious fraud Cruzbot type. And, if your guy wins the nomination, you really expect those who supported Cruz to enthusiastically come to your side?
Really?
135
posted on
03/31/2016 4:26:21 PM PDT
by
okie01
(The Mainstream media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: Signalman
Let me ask all you pure conservatives something. You like driving on interstate highways? You want our military to have the finest equipment? You want our police to be properly armed and trained?If not for taxes, whos going to pay for the above? Yes, there is lots of waste in the government. But there are some things the private sector cannot, or should not, administer or run.
Congratulations, your support for Donald Trump has turned you into a Democrat. Anything else you care to argue about from a left perspective?
Kush
136
posted on
03/31/2016 4:51:20 PM PDT
by
Kush
(Insert your own witty, patriotic, or sarcastic remark here.)
To: T. P. Pole
Not well versed, but very familiar with this lie from the left. Well, obviously - the Left, and ESPECIALLY the weasels in the Wisconsin Left, will always lie.
I did further investigation, and STILL can't tell.
To: kiryandil
Try
this.
State budget agency requests would create $2.2 billion deficit
MADISON, Wis. -
A first look at the state budget picture for the next two years shows the state could face a potential $2.2 billion shortfall if all state agency requests are granted.
The numbers released by the Walker administration as required by state law Thursday show that agency requests outpace expected revenue by $2.2 billion.
Department of Administration Secretary Mike Huebsch said it is a "flawed assumption" that all of those requests will be granted.
. . .
Republicans point out that the number is only based on a wish list by agency heads.
"The reality is thats not going to happen," Assembly Speaker Rep. Robin Vos, R-Rochester, said in a statement. "We will continue to manage the states finances by making prudent decisions and doing whats best for Wisconsin and its taxpayers."
To: mlo
After seeing the opposition, not at all.
139
posted on
03/31/2016 5:48:09 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
To: huldah1776; neocon1984
He said some stuff about Wisconsin and Walker's deficit. Even the lefty fact checkers said it was completely false. Trump said he only knows what he reads in Time.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson