Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DC Madam’s Attorney Says He Has Record Log That Could “Upend 2016 Election”
GP ^ | 03/31/16 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 03/31/2016 5:23:43 AM PDT by Enlightened1

The lawyer for the former “DC Madam” says he has a record log of contacts that could “upend the 2016 election.”

This comes a week after the National Enquirer released their Ted Cruz cheating scandal story.
USNews.com reported

A lawyer who represented the so-called “D.C. madam” says he has phone records that could influence the outcome of the presidential election, and he’s threatening to release one or more names on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court if he’s denied a hearing on his right to distribute them.

Montgomery Blair Sibley, the late madam Deborah Palfrey’s colorful attorney, has been subject to a restraining order since 2007 barring him from releasing the information, which he says includes 815 names, addresses and Social Security numbers of Verizon Wireless customers.

“Time is of the essence because people are casting votes in primaries and caucuses,” he says. “I believe this information is relevant to that political discourse.”

Sibley first said the records could be relevant to the presidential race in January, when there were 15 high-profile candidates. Now, just three Republicans and two Democrats remain – though Sibley won’t say if any are implicated, citing fear of being jailed for contempt.

He would not say if he was surprised by a National Enquirer report last week that alleged Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, had engaged in five extramarital affairs. Cruz, currently in second place in the GOP contest, vigorously denied the report on Friday, and in doing so uncapped mainstream media coverage.

Cruz was first elected to the Senate in 2012 but represented Texas several times during Supreme Court arguments while Palfrey’s escort business operated.

 

 

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: attorney; cruz; dcmadam; prostitutes; scandals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: Enlightened1

Why assume it’s about Cruz? My money is on Hilary and/or Bill.


41 posted on 03/31/2016 8:03:06 AM PDT by chae (The Lannisters send their regards--Game of Thrones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hatteras

ask David Vitter about the DC Madam’s information


42 posted on 03/31/2016 8:04:11 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

Some people hire prostitutes to humiliate them. Not sure Lindsey needs any MORE of that. But to each his own.

//sarc


43 posted on 03/31/2016 8:54:56 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Ask Bernie supporters two questions: Who is rich. Who decides. In the past, that meant who died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

Concocted Scandal is now a 150 hours old, and NADA Proven. Once and for all,..... Put up or ....... Because the boomarang effect is already in play.
================+============+===
The Clinton defense part 2


44 posted on 03/31/2016 8:59:26 AM PDT by stocksthatgoup (GOPe/MSM - "When we want your opinion, we will give it to you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup
The Clinton defense part 2

I have said on several threads that I would drop my support for Cruz if some definable proof was provided of this scandal besides salacious tabloid twitter fodder.

At Hour 152, and nothing yet. Do you realize the longer this draws out without resolution the worse it makes Trump look?

Networks (right or not) are already putting more play in the Stone-Pecker henchman story that the original alleged scandal itself.

LET"S SEE SOME PROOF ONE WAY OR THE OTHER!!!!!

45 posted on 03/31/2016 9:22:21 AM PDT by catfish1957 (I display the Confederate Battle Flag with pride in honor of my brave ancestors who fought w/ valor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: pilgrim
Is this wrong?

Was the exact same tactics that were used by the NE on Sarah Palin wrong?

46 posted on 03/31/2016 9:26:49 AM PDT by catfish1957 (I display the Confederate Battle Flag with pride in honor of my brave ancestors who fought w/ valor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957; Enlightened1
Quote from #1,

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3415897/posts?page=1#1

The National Enquirer and the Daily Mail both said Ted Cruz paid for Prostitutes.

It was stated that the NE AND the Daily Mail both said!

Daily Mail was quoting NE and has never made that statement.

By the logic used by the Enlightened1 one could say that FReepublic has said that "Ted Cruz paid for Prostitutes" because it was quoted here.

Not sure what the NE said re: Sarah. Just showing the untruth of the above statement.
47 posted on 03/31/2016 9:52:25 AM PDT by pilgrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson