Another federal judge allows that Clinton email server may have been set up “in bad faith

hotair.com ^ | 3/30/2016 | Jazz Shaw

[rktman]

As Hillary Clinton awaits word of when she and some of her top aides will be called in for a chat with the FBI, another court case has moved forward demanding transparency and testimony from her State Department staff regarding her email server. Assuming this stands, any of the principal players could be called into court to offer sworn testimony as to the evolution of events which led to sensitive national security information being potentially exposed. In the ruling, the judge cited the possibility of Clinton and her staff acting “in bad faith” with a constantly shifting narrative of what took place and why.

[rktman]

Well, maybe they just "forgot" they shouldn't have done that. Or maybe it was just an "accident" they did that. All they really need to do to answer is give the old "My bad." statement and all will be forgiven. Do any of the underlings hear that "Greyhound" bearing down on them?

[PGalt]

Another federal judge? How many federal judges does it take to screw a republic?

Another, and another, etc., etc.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY0WxgSXdEE

[Obadiah]

Here we go...

It wasn’t Hillary and Sid Vicious after all. It was the fault of rogue underlings, who by the way, will be hung to prove that justice was done... while Hillary, Huma, and Sid all walk.

[Thank You Rush]

“”In the ruling, the judge cited the possibility of Clinton and her staff acting “in bad faith” with a constantly shifting narrative of what took place and why.””

I would say the title “set up in bad faith” is not consistent with the above statement. “Set up” is definitely before the fact and the “narrative” after the fact IMO.

The beast is great at “I don’t recall” responses so all that’s needed is for her to give some tutoring sessions to her former employees - no problem!

We can get Paul Shanklin back on the job to remind everyone how she does it if we have to.

[scooby321]

She is National Review’s Candidate

[Justa]

Geesh. Doesn’t anyone realize the judge is saying he believes the server was setup to evade security protections?

I.e. “bad faith” means the court can entertain allegations of espionage. It’s the heart of the matter at the center of a heart of darkness.

Hat tips to Mr. Greene and Mr. Conrad.

[Fhios]

Spoliation of evidence and the verified fact that Hillary and crew kept pressure up on the NSA to relax security for them so they could access the hidden server is more than enough to indict.

Passing classified information to Sidney Blumenthal was espionage.

[GOPJ]

I would say the title “set up in bad faith” is not consistent with the above statement. “Set up” is definitely before the fact and the “narrative” after the fact IMO.

Selling access and inside 'information' is what the Clinton's do... it's why the 'set up' happened...

[GOPJ]

The Clintons don't build buildings, they don't make a product, there's never been a 'paycheck' either worked for that would cover their lifestyle... NOPE, they SELL access and they sell secret information that can't be bought on the free markets...

[gloryblaze]

So much out there. It is like an intricate monster. If she beats this rap, she will be able to walk on water after having survived what she’ll call the biggest vendetta the world has ever seen. Woe is us.

[little jeremiah]

Placemark.