Looks like despite all the furor over what has been called the Cuban Mistress Crisis, the bolt under the radar about Heidi’s globalist connections shot true.
At least that’s one way of looking at it. I’m sure there are plenty of other ways.
nclaurel wrote: “I finally found the NAU report. Heidi Cruz’ comment is under Additional and Dissenting Opinions on pages 33 and 34 of the paper. I would say from reading it that it is one of the additional opinions and not dissenting. Taken directly from the paper.”
[quoting Heidi Cruz ...] I support the Task Force report and its recommendations aimed at building a safer and more prosperous North America. Economic prosperity and a world safe from terrorism and other security threats are no doubt inextricably linked. While governments play an invaluable role in both regards, we must emphasize the imperative that economic investment be led and perpetuated by the private sector. There is no force proven like the market for aligning incentives, sourcing capital, and producing results like financial markets and profit-making businesses. This is simply necessary to sustain a higher living standard for the poorest among us—truly the measure of our success. As such, investment funds and financing mechanisms should be deemed attractive instruments by those committing the capital and should only be developed in conjunction with market participants. — Heidi S. Cruz
I believe there’s around a 3 year statute of limitations on libel FROM THE DATE OF THE PUBLIC DISCLOSURE of the alleged acts. If the allegations are FALSE, where’s the lawsuit?
Cruz, legal scholar extraordinaire, could probably dash it off longhand between campaign stops and have a lawyer supporter in NY file it for him. A few alleged psychologists trained in the area have claimed on line that Cruz is lying that the story is “garbage”.
Inasmuch as truth is a positive defense, once Cruz takes that step, all Trump and the owner of the publication need do is to bring forth one or more of the “ladies” under oath in court to swear to the truth of the claims and provide details of and evidence re. the encounters. I seriously doubt said “ladies” would risk perjury charges and jail for Ted (or for Trump and the other defendants for that matter if they tried to buy their perjured testimony).
The situation has become more problematic for Cruz as one of the “ladies” (whose name escapes me at the moment) HAS SCRUBBED HER INTERNET ACCOUNTS OF ALL HER EXCHANGES WITH CRUZ. The BIGGER problem is that many of those exchanges have already been captured by third parties.
If any of this IS true, except for the Christians Cruz has convinced of his righteousness, nobody else much cares about his dalliances. What many MAY care about — as Bill Clinton knows — is Cruz LYING ABOUT and TRYING TO COVER IT UP!
Could be nothing. Then again, could be another case of “...feet of clay”. It’s sure happened before.
And Trump called that one correctly.