‘He calls it “garbage and false”’
LOL, sounds like a pretty clear denial to anyone with a brain.
-—‘He calls it “garbage and false”’
LOL, sounds like a pretty clear denial to anyone with a brain.
.
.
.
Sounds like wormy lawyer type carve out words.
In other words “the story is false” (like perhaps one line in the story, but 99% is true, therefore the story is false)
Normally, one would agree that a simple “it’s false” would work. For me and you, and most folks that would be fine, but this is a lawyer (a genius lawyer some say) and a politician, so we as people break down exactly what they say, as they (as lawyers) parse their words very very carefully.
Wordsmithing is an art form in the world of law and politics.
His language is clear enough that, should the story turn out to be true, only a Clintonesque parsing of the phraseology can result in in not being a lie.
No it is not. National Enquirer stories can be called garbage and still be true. Cruz could have 3, 4 or 6 women and the story would be false. Cruz is a lawyer, he knows how to definitively deny allegations and he is not doing it.
‘He calls it “garbage and false”’
LOL, sounds like a pretty clear denial to anyone with a
brain.
==
Let’s see, we know he’s lying about Trump being fault, it came from Rubio, so why not assume his denial is also a lie.
Liars lie, it’s what they do.
Agree. Very strong denial. Also, it would be difficult for Cruz to sue because libel claims are extremely narrow for sitting Senators. The NE article is carefully couched to say “there are reports that” with out facts to back it up. Sanchez’ feelings are posted as fact. Weak.
Actually “garbage” has nothing to do with truth or falseness. How about a simple “I did not have sex with those women, and I have not been unfaithful to my wife”.
Preferably with a hand on the Bible.
Lyin’ Ted.
‘He calls it “garbage and false”’
—
Is the story for one of the women garbage and false or are all of the stories concerning all of the women garbage and false?
I would prefer the stories not be true but he wasn’t very clear.
Really. I would call it “lawyer speak” which Ted excels at.
No, it simply means that the story as reported is incorrect.
Cruz’s lies make Clinton look like a piker.
One big dif is Clinton was smart enough to know when to shut up.
Those with a brain recall how Clintonian parsing and denial works.
When an article accuses one of 5 affairs when maybe only 3 are really true, one can righteously exclaim that the article is "garbage and false" without denying that affairs took place.
Is that what is happening is happening here? I have no opinion. But I do know Clinton-like parsing when I see it.
-PJ
[[LOL, sounds like a pretty clear denial to anyone with a brain.]]
People’s brains unfortunately are blinded by bloodlust- they will not be denied their gallows hanging
...” sounds like a pretty clear denial to anyone with a brain”....
He’s not going to feed the alligators.....