Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dear NYT Editorial Board, The AR-15 Does Not Fire In 'Rapid Bursts
townhall.com ^ | 3/27/2016 | Matt Vespa

Posted on 03/28/2016 5:04:34 AM PDT by rktman

The Conservative Political Action Conference earlier this month almost made me forget about this fancy piece of fiction from The New York Times editorial board, which is that the AR-15 is an automatic weapon. The board was voicing their support for Americans to sue the gun industry; it’s a position that would certainly be abused by anti-gun liberals to litigate the gun manufacturers out of existence. We cannot let that happen. This nauseating March 4 op-ed was written as the families of Sandy Hook wait to hear if their lawsuit against Remington Arms can move forward:

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; mommunists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: buwaya

“Frankly I don’t see why full auto weapons are banned, they are less deadly.”

That is an easy one. They were banned because not many people had them, for the reasons you give. So there was little support to stop the proposed “tax” system pushed hard by the full power of the FDR regime.

They are banned because FDR was able to push it through.

Originally, the ban was only for full autos transported across state lines. Later on, the Supreme Court kept on mutilating the meaning of the commerce clause to include everything, so it came to apply to all full autos, even those kept inside a single state’s boundaries.


21 posted on 03/28/2016 7:22:09 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bert
...the guide is “one can not yell fire in a crowded theater”

Unless, of course, there is actually a fire.

22 posted on 03/28/2016 7:51:25 AM PDT by CPOSharky (Ban "gun free" zones. They are magnets for mass killers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bert

It needs to be tightened up!


23 posted on 03/28/2016 8:02:20 AM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Maybe they were banned to restrict the capabilities of paramilitary organizations that might well use them for suppressive fire against police or military, in other words, the mob.


24 posted on 03/28/2016 8:04:49 AM PDT by ichabod1 (Spriiingtime for islam, and tyranny. Winter for US and frieeends. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1

Organized crime did use a few full auto guns, but the uses were very small in number. All the ones that I know about were guns that were stolen, so it made little difference.

I have studied the 1934 law, and as best I can see, it was a blatant power grab by the FDR administration, that missed its main mark, but set the tone for much wider spread infringements on the Second Amendment.

It was intended to register and eventually eliminate pistols from private ownership.

It failed at that, but managed to pass the stupid law that has been in place since 1934.


25 posted on 03/28/2016 8:19:02 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson