[X-spurt]

It damn sure was not GQ, they held no rights. Conde Nast does, except “those” photos were made public domain earlier this year.

Any BS you read about anyone buying the rights from GQ are simple BS.

[Bob434]

[[It damn sure was not GQ, they held no rights. Conde Nast does, except “those” photos were made public domain earlier this year.

Any BS you read about anyone buying the rights from GQ are simple BS.]]

Bears repeating because the GQ fella making the statement that they were purchased is lying if this is true- Condi Nast said noone had a right to use they photos- because he alone holds the rights to them and gave noone permission to use them- GQ has been i nthe business a long time and would have known NOT to use or issue the photos to someone else without the express permission of Condi- GQ isn’t i n the business of copywrite infringement- they aren’t stupid, and woudl risk being sued out of existence by illegally selling something they had no right to sell

[af_vet_1981]

It damn sure was not GQ, they held no rights. Conde Nast does, except “those” photos were made public domain earlier this year.

Any BS you read about anyone buying the rights from GQ are simple BS.

Are you an attorney ?