Posted on 03/27/2016 3:53:00 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Ted Cruz and the ‘Cuban Mistress Crisis’–
The National Enquirer published a story last week accusing Texas Senator Ted Cruz of multiple extramarital affairs.
On Friday Ted Cruz blamed Donald Trump and his former consultant Roger Stone for the National Enquirer article on his alleged extramarital affairs.
Ted Cruz Cruz told reporters in Wisconsin the story was “all lies.” Cruz then went on to blame the article on Donald Trump and his “henchmen.” Cruz argued Roger Stone has been forwarding the article today on the internet. He thinks Trump campaign is behind this story. Cruz also said the publisher of the National Enquirer is a friend of Donald Trump’s.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Washington Post & Other Media Outlets In Possession of Senator Ted Cruz's Hooker Videos
Only because she was able to prove “actual malice”...This was back in the 1980s...You can bet the NE has learned from that one and worded their articles carefully to avoid further such incidents. Bet you can’t name a handful of people who have won against the NE since then.
If all these outlets have the video, where is it?
Because the media and political consulting homies gots to gets paid!
long election seasons are one of the many DC gravy trains.
HO ho ho!
Seems she’s now gone under cover!
I always thought it was strange that Bill Clinton felt like he needed to qualify who he was talking about. “...that woman, Ms. Lewinski.” Later we found out it could been one of many women.
I think we should all be skeptical.
Let’s see what comes out this week.
Stupid is as stupid does!
Time will tell
If he did hire her and take her across state line he has committed a federal crime aka a Eliot Spitzer It should be easy enough to prove and or disprove as he is accused of paying for plane ride to Maryland and rental car so she could drive to Alexandria. Until then ....
Oh my gosh, I must be getting eye strain. I read your post as “erection” cycle. This sex thing sure has us all in a tither.
Maybe, but, he’s never wrong. He has moles inside very campaign and knows what goes on.
Do they provide pop porn with those videos ?
I'm not them, I don't know. However, the rumor that they have them has been out for weeks, it just hasn't been very public yet.
Even if they have them, they only show the possibility that there was hanky panky, not actual proof of any.
I know we all wish the media would just come out and release everything on everybody the instant we are told they might have something, but that isn't how it's done.
Time will tell if this thing has any legs.
Now, if they have video of Cruz and a hooker entering the hotel/restaurant.... then it gets a bit harder to say it was just coworkers having lunch.
It’s this way because the Rats and the GOPee WANT it this way. It’s for the same reason that we have budget deficits.
There are 536 individuals in DC, counting the POTUS, who pontificate and lie their buttocks off, decrying budget deficits. Well, since those 536 liars are the REASON we HAVE budget deficits, and consequently HAVE a $20 TRILLION National Debt, is because they ALL VOTED for them.
For that same reason, our primary and general election set-up is a slobovian fire drill. They want it this way.
Perhaps you missed my post to you earlier today Theo when I first addressed this for you?
_____________________________________________
It’s a reference to “ratf*cker” — the nickname given Roger Stone because of his political tactics. Cruz didn’t make the term up.
Theo, the phrase indeed is “ratf*cker” but how stupid can Cruz be as to sublimate his beta maleness and use the word ‘copulate’ instead? REAL men are not afraid to use the F-word when it is appropriate and I can’t think of a more appropriate situation to use it when responding to allegations of marital infidelity against one’s wife.
If Cruz had said “look, I think Donald Trump is f—kin’ with me, but I have no desire to f—k with him”, 99 percent of the people reading or hearing that statement would understand it completely and probably agree with Cruz.
But good God man, Cruz must be politically tone deaf if he thought that it would be ok for him to say that he “doesn’t have any desire to copulate with Trump”?!?
Cruz is afraid to man up, legally and literally.
This does not look good. For me, it’s the way she went after Trump endorsers. Very personally. Ann Coulter never would do that.
I saw what I think is the CArpenter little girl. I’m with you...I’m not sure so it should be off grounds.
But there’s something about her that is creepy. I’ve dated some of these types. They are 24/7 high energy gals. Think of the gal in Broadcast News, and Network (can’t remember the actresses).
As we speak, she is tweeting like a school girl stuff about Trump personally. Trashing him. Don’t you think that’s odd?
Also, there’s a hiatus in all the campaigns right now. Why? I think Trump want the media not to focus at all on him. He wants to be clean if and when the shoe falls.
I’m feeling bad here for Cruz, as I think this might be true. Why did Rubio not endorse him when he could have?
http://www.dangerandplay.com/2016/03/27/cruzsexscandal-amanda-carpenter/
It doesn't matter. He needs to file a lawsuit, regardless.
Otherwise people will think that they reason he didn't, is because he doesn't want to submit to discovery, under oath.
I wonder why they would be going to a hotel? To count campaign contributions? \
“I did not have sexual relations with that woman, (insert any of 5 names.) I never told anybody to lie, not a single time. Ever. These allegations are false.”
If Cruz comes out and says "There is no sexual relationship", I think my head will explode...
For the low IQ and possessors of low discernment amongst us, the “avengersocial” site is a place that random posters can go to post anything they want to make up (e.g., fictional transcript of a non-existent “interview” of a non-existent “source” saying anything the writer wants to all edge.)
If you’re a Trumpster you create such fiction and/or search out such fiction and link to it in a FR posting. That’s what you do. It’s dishonest, bogus & creepy but apparently gives shallow Trumpsters some measure of satisfaction. IMHO, it’s pretty damn sad & pathetic.
According to various reports, the location is a HOTEL and RESTAURANT.
So... could be they were just coworkers having lunch, or they thought the fact the restaurant was there gave them cover for a quickie somewhere in the hotel.
What would be interesting would be to find out if this hotel/Rest. is frequented by the rich and powerful who use it for just that purpose.
I am sure there are Freepers in that area that know the 'reputation' of that place.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.