Roger Stone on Cruz Sex Scandal: Ted Cruz Won’t Sue “Because the Allegations Are Largely True”

The Gateweay Pundit ^ | March 27, 2016 | Jim Hoft

[caww]

There’s a story about tattoos that this played off from among the Cruz campaign...and even went so far as making the news....long before this silly issue people are making now. Such a gullible public this nation has become.....

[UCANSEE2]

(which incidentally has a restaurant and is used by many to conduct business over dinner evidently)

Another question.

Was Cruz staying in the hotel ? Because I've seen people eat at a hotel restaurant who stay at the hotel, but those who aren't staying in a hotel usually don't go to a hotel to go to the restaurant. Most of the time, the food is cheaper for guests, and it's usually not that good. I'm sure there are exceptions, but you have to ask yourself, If a bunch of wealthy, powerful men take women to a restaurant at a hotel quite often, especially in DC well known for it's prostitution, don't you have the slightest bit of suspicion about the choice of a restaurant that conveniently is in a hotel ? (sorry about the run-on sentence)

When you want to go out to eat, do you look for a restaurant in a hotel ?

[Jack Straw from Wichita]

Can you fill us in?

[UCANSEE2]

There’s a story

I'm sure there is.

The question is, if you were seen going in and out of a hotel/restaurant with a 'coworker', and then that coworker got some temporary tattoos, and you both put them on, then that coworker let you wear some of his/her clothes, and you thought it was 'so cool' and you tweeted that you 'loved him/her', WHAT WOULD YOUR SPOUSE SAY ?

And what if some of the video shows more than just one female going in and out of the hotel/restaurant with Ted ? Like , for instance, a prostitute ?

Sure.... it could all be innocent. I just don't think rational 45 year old men who are running for President wear temporary tattoos. Would Ted have done this if his 'coworker' wasn't involved ?

You do understand what the wearing of a man's suit jacket means, don't you ? Of course, there is no proof yet that it was his, other than that he went on stage without it, in a situation where no one understood why he didn't have his suit jacket on.

[UCANSEE2]

Such a gullible public this nation has become.....

Actually, it's been a gullible nation for a long time. Some people are just now waking up and smelling the roses.

[UCANSEE2]

bkmk

[Bob434]

[[Most of the time, the food is cheaper for guests, and it’s usually not that good.]]

Yeah because there’s no such thing as swanky restaurants with great food in hotels- oh wait- yes there is-

Got it all figured out huh? I suggest you check out online some of the high class hotels with 5 star restaurants- there are plenty of them- what you said simply isn’t true- There aren’t just exceptions, there are plenty of resteraunts in hotels known for great food- I worked at several myself- people came just to eat all the time- and for good reason, because the table fare was world class-

[[but you have to ask yourself, If a bunch of wealthy, powerful men take women to a restaurant at a hotel quite often, especially in DC well known for it’s prostitution, don’t you have the slightest bit of suspicion about the choice of a restaurant that conveniently is in a hotel ?]]

No- I wait until there is sufficient evidence that is actual evidence before I make up my mind and i don’t speculate about such nonsense and let evidence speak for itself because we’re talking about a man with a family, a wife and young kids here- and if he is innocent- rumor mongering and vicious gossip and uneducated guessing threatens to destroy an innocent person and his family- I take God’s commands agaisnt rumor mongering and vicious gossip very seriously- He calls it an abomination precisely because when it’s practiced agaisnt anyone, even if the person is later foudn to be innocent- it ruins that person’s reputation for good-

It won’t matter now if Ted is innocent because tump supporters and democrats are simply going to claim that he ‘just wasn’t caught because of insufficient evidence’ and they will forever label him an adulterer without any proof that he was- this God hates! and it’s something we need to realize God doesn’t take lightly-

IF there is concrete evidence that Ted has had an affair- let it run it’s course, and then you can say whatever you like about him- but all this speculation and wondering about ‘what if’s’ is uncalled for-

We shoudl not be so desirous of seeing anyoen destroyed that we begin to say ‘he wouldn’t do this’ or ‘he shoudl have done that’ therefore ‘he’s guilty as sin’ Everyoen does not act by some set of guidelines and act the same on all occasions-

IF Ted was nothing but just close friends with Amanda, and here we sit as a ‘conservative site’ tearing him apart without any proof other than what we THINK he should or shouldn’t do then we should be ashamed of ourselves for doing so-

Believe it or not- there are still people fully capable of having a close friendship with the opposite sex and NOT doing anything wrong ever- and when they go to a ‘working lunch’ or working dinner, it’s exactly that- working dinners- and when they get tattoos together- it’s done simply because they are friends and nothing more- Believe it or not- not everyone walks around with their minds in the gutter all the time- and many still value honest and true friendships-

[trebb]

This can’t be. I was assured by none other than Blen Gleck that Cruz was The Anointed One.

And Cruz wasn't shy about making the same claims/intimations.

[trebb]

Roger Stone makes pond scum look like a moral exemplar.

If Cruz ends up being clean, that makes sense. Else, it appears to be misdirected flailing because one's "pure of heart" candidate may actually have a few character warts.

[PraiseTheLord]

something interesting coming TODAY ? (My re-post)

10:38 AM - 27 Mar 2016 —— A TWEET FROM ROGER STONE

Tomorrow- The big steal from @realDonaldTrump Exclusive report from the front lines. With @RealAlexJones on @infowars at Noon EST- 1 pm CST

[not sure about the time -Infowars is noon ET for 4 hours]

[af_vet_1981]

It damn sure was not GQ, they held no rights. Conde Nast does, except “those” photos were made public domain earlier this year.

Any BS you read about anyone buying the rights from GQ are simple BS.

Are you an attorney ?

[caww]

Nobody knows what that was about...the information is spun over and over again.....it would pay to just ignore the nonsense and there's a lot of it.....unless of course you're one that thinks sexual scandals are significant today.....most don't and don't care...IE. Bill Clinton...he hasn't suffered even a bit.

Here's Cruz having fun with the Fox team about the Tattoo...as well as in his office.....it's just foolish to heed the smut they're printing now.....

It all began with playing off the poster some guy put out on Cruz ....fun stuff suddenly becomes smut news...months later...and dumb downed public loves a scandal.

[caww]

This scandal reminds me of a Pastor who went into a bar to speak with a womans husband who had asked for his help....on the way out the Pastor tripped on the thresh-hold and was “seen” stumbling out of a bar.

Needless say the the story was he was falling down drunk.

Things are not always what they might appear to be....especially during a knock out election we have today.

[jwalsh07]

No. Whether Cruz cheated on his wife or not Roger Stone is still slime.

[DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis]

What in the world are you talking about? I’m assuming you meant to reply to some other poster.

[DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis]

Lol you wish!

[DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis]

Well, if he wants to use it to make a point, there is that....

[spel_grammer_an_punct_polise]

“Lol you wish!”

Well, at least you have a sense of humor. That is more than I can say for many FReepers. ;-)

[X-spurt]

No, you were poorly trying to defend Nasty Enquirer and thus Trump by direct association and I retorted your limp defense of both.

[UCANSEE2]

OK. Ted got a ‘temporary’ tattoo to be kool like de udda kids.

Now, why did Amanda Carpenter have matching one ?