Posted on 03/27/2016 1:35:16 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
There is no evidence that Ted Cruz attacked Donald Trump's wife.
In a normal election year, this statement would be relatively uncontroversial. After all, it's true. Yes, there was an ad that ran in Utah, suggesting that because she had posed for provocative modeling photos, she was somehow unfit to be first lady. But, no, that ad was not from the Cruz campaign. It was from the Make America Awesome super PAC, a group that raises and spends money without input from any candidate, including Cruz.
How do I know that? Well, I know that if such a political action committee were to coordinate with Cruz -- say, by running an ad at his behest -- it would be a federal crime. I know a presidential candidate purposefully violating federal law is almost certainly not worth the risk. I know that Cruz was going to win Utah anyway, by a wide margin, so violating federal law to win with 70 percent of the vote versus 65 percent is a particularly dumb idea.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Please provide a link proving Jeff Roe got a license to use the Melania Trump photo used in the ad.
Thanks.
GQ was the owner of publication rights. They would know who they sold it to
GQ verified it. Google that
Scream "Liar" - "Establishment" - "Goldman Sachs" all ya want.
He was on some show this morning but I didn’t see it. Friend told me Cruz got to lie for a 1/2 hr straight about everything without interruption or serious questions.
I googled it but all I get are people saying GQ verified it. I don’t find any article where they actually did.
And yet to you the National Enquirer is a reliable source. Freaking moron.
Nope.
Might be another one of those rumors that seem to be populating FR these days
I remember you. You’re that weirdo stalker.
This is a war of headlines and Trump is losing it on substantive issues such as hating immigrants, Muslims and women.
Like your not on every thread knocking Cruz. It would be hard not to run into you. As far as weird, at least I don't look like a deranged orange guinea pig.
I have no idea what you are babbling about, and I’m sure you don’t have any idea either.
Real story is Cruz’s PAC and Carly Fiorina’s PAC have same address.
When the Chigago protesters shut down trump, Cruz is quoted as saying “a candidate is responsible for the culture of his campaign.” So by his logic Cruz I’d responsible for the ads that are released that have his name on it and benefit him in elections...I’m sure he wasn’t complaining about any votes he got as a result.
With a name like Starstruck, this is right up your alley!
They’ve been right about Jon Edwards & Reilly Hunter, Gary Hart & Donna Rice, Tiger Woods, Billy Joel, Mel Gibson, OJ Simpson, Ennis Cosby, Whitney Houston, Bristol Palin & Levi Johnson, and many many more.
Enquiring minds want to know!
and
According to the experts, former CIA deception agents:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3414444/posts?page=1#1
“...we were struck by the volume of deceptive behavior that we identified in these statements.
Behaviorally, when the facts are the ally of an individual, he or she almost always tends to focus on the facts of the matter at hand.
In this case, if the key fact was that he had not had these affairs, Cruz would almost certainly have been much more strongly focused on the denial. That is, he very likely would have made a point of explicitly stating something along the lines of, “I did not have these affairs.”
>>>>Ted never denies having the affairs, does he?<<<<
Silence.
Just as we all thought, there is no evidence.
I know that Cruz was going to win Utah anyway, by a wide margin, so violating federal law to win with 70 percent of the vote versus 65 percent is a particularly dumb idea.
This is why whoever ran the ad is an idiot.
This tape shows that on 8 March Cruz spokesperson started this ball rolling.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.