Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Parley Baer
The question is, was the picture used illegally or did someone from the Cruz PAC purchase rights to the picture?

Both the photographer and the model would have contractual a say in that, rights are "managed" and detrimental use would not have been approved by the model in this instance, imho.

59 posted on 03/27/2016 11:30:01 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: RegulatorCountry

What modeling agency represented Melania Knauss at the time?


61 posted on 03/27/2016 11:31:08 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: RegulatorCountry

To follow up on this, I read a small comment earlier today from the photographer who owns the photograph of Melania Trump.

He pointed out that the photo is UK copyrighted, not USA - and he was surprised no one contacted him to get his permission. So while he was very pleased his pic was getting all sorts of attention, he was not happy it was used without his permission.

So, if this comment is legitimately from the true photo owner—GQ had no legal right to authorize its use.

(and as an aside, GQ was snarky in their initial mention of Trump — AND -— they downplayed, probably on purpose—just what the real details were about how the photo was used.)


145 posted on 03/27/2016 6:55:41 PM PDT by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson