[dangus]

>> Where’s the call for retraction of I’ll sue? ... then why lawyer up? <<

Uh... to sue?

To be clear: all of the women are unnamed and published as denying it. The fact that Nat Examiner DID write that they all are denying it means that Cruz’ campaign can’t turn the women against the magazine then sue the magazine. Nat Examiner has decades of practice beating slander lawsuits... and writing articles to know exactly how to make any slander suits against them beatable.

[DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis]

Nat Examiner has decades of practice beating slander lawsuits... and writing articles to know exactly how to make any slander suits against them beatable.

Well, if they didn't they would be out of business really quick considering how much of what they publish is BS.

[MaxistheBest]

“Roger Stone”

If it really was Stone who is responsible for the article....

Why would he allow himself to be quoted in the article ???

[patlin]

To be clear: all of the women are unnamed and published as denying it...

To be clear... It amazes me how people are not able to read simple English these days. The article says that only Katrina responded to NE with a denial.