So you folks are so blind that you think the National Enquirer is a reliable news source?
“...you think the National Enquirer is a reliable news source?”
Has Ted threatened to sue the National Enquirer for libel yet?
If not, why not? He’s innocent, right?
I mean, he’s the sharpest lawyer in the country, so he certainly knows the law regarding such things, right?
[[So you folks are so blind that you think the National Enquirer is a reliable news source?]]
Not only that but they insist that Ted take full responsibility when someone somewhere who has ever had any contact with him whatsoever, says or does something bad, but when a good pal of donald trump, runs a hit piece of ted, why then this fella can’t possibly be tied to donald (despite the NE doing another hit piece on carson on behalf of trump not long ago)
National Enquirer isn’t the only source on this, and John Edwards could tell you about the Enquirer. Looks like blindness is endemic among Cruz boosters.
You’re the last person who should be whining about reliable news sources with all the drivel you get paid to post here.
I am a Cruz supporter. The National Enquirer IS a reliable news source. However, I have read the Enquirer story and it is too early to find Cruz guilty. The Enquirer reports that there are rumors Cruz has had affairs and that they are investigating the rumors. If these rumors are true, there will be a follow-up article with definitive assertions that there were affairs.
Stay tuned, folks.
Two words: John Edwards