To me, I have not seen where Trump categorically and formally demanded this to the rules committee. If he has, I’d like to see it so I can be informed to real facts.
By morphing campaign talk into the equivalent actual ‘demands’ only in the sense that Trump is the sole offender is disingenuous, particularly in light of many members of the GOPe poweratti actively advocating even taking away a legitimate 1237 lead if that candidate be Donald Trump. And all this, even before the actual nomination convention is actually convened.
I have no knowledge of Trump making a formal demand that the rules be changed in his favor but I am aware of statements or tweets to that effect.
As I said, it is better to inform ourselves now of the facts and history of the rules situation than to be blindsided at the last minute in a dispute that Trump has clearly initiated if only on an informal level.Surely you don't suggest that we would be better served by conscious pursuit of ignorance?