There’s no “protection” involved here. It is all about power over others.
“Mommy, why is the hairy man in the bathroom?”
Because gays who go see little boys in Thailand do not have a choice in their sexuality, but the little Thai boys were never forced and never victims.
Is it me or the gay protection rhetoric robs the pedophile and sexual predator control language?
So because some homophobe crazy beats on gays now gays are immune and considered the ultimate born that way victims without choices? What about he raped little kids or those adopted by gays? Do they have choices?
Last visit to Kokomo was memorable. Double Whopper caused double barf attack three, ha. And now this —— ? (Shame! It looks like such s nice town....)
Someone makes a lifestyle choice to be a sexual deviant and they are accorded special protections under the law. How does that reconcile with the Fourteenth Amendment?
But it’s still okay to discriminate against white heterosexual male Christians and patriots.
“The measure protects lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender citizens from discrimination. It also bans discrimination based on marital status, age or veteran status. “
1. Age? Discrimination based on age is embedded in the law.
2. When are they going to make it unlawful to discriminate and deny service to all the folks who like to go into places without wearing shirts or shoes? It’s discriminatory to not include them under anti-discrimination laws.
You don't have a right to force your deviant morality on me. You don't have a right to tell me who I must serve and who I cannot ban.
When I saw the LGBTXYZ thing in the title, this is the one that came to mind-
“Aruba, Jamaica, ooh I wanna take you
To Bermuda, Bahama, come on pretty mama
Key Largo Montego, baby why don’t we go
Ooh I wanna take you down to Kokomo,
we’ll get there fast and then we’ll take it slow
That’s where we wanna go, way down in Kokomo”...
When you are special you get special treatment