Posted on 03/13/2016 3:09:35 PM PDT by Innovative
Someone should really document that kind of thing better if we are agoing to have to defend this in the general election.
No I was responding to the frog guy. He had lied to you and that was part of the conversation which is why I pinged you.
My goodness don’t get so angry.
OK, thanks for the clarification.
In 1980, Carter led Reagan 45-32 midway through March.
http://themonkeycage.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/trialheats1980.png
well, for what it’s worth, here’s the interview with baby Andy, a very spontaneous kinda guy, who saw a tomato, gathered his friends, and went off to a rally:
http://www.kwwl.com/story/31463541/2016/03/14/man-who-threw-tomato-at-trump-has-no-regrets
the crowd’s reaction is in the video (clapping, pointing out)
and then there was that Muslim gal that was ‘silently protesting’. Here’s the scoop on her, and the 8 or 9 people who put quite a bit of planning into their little field trip to the rally.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hixrLVIsCfI';
Even Trump's inconsistent positions are much better than Hillary's consistently bad ones.
Well, let us talk about why I am so angry.
Last Friday, liberal thugs staged disruption at one of Trump’s rallies. But the thing is that it wasn’t disruption and it wasn’t a protest.
What was happening was a literal terror attack.
There were injuries, but the attackers refused to allow ambulances in to care for the injured. These thugs literally wounded people, caused great property damage, and screamed obscenities at people, and why? To scare them. To cause terror. A literal terror attack against people who came to hear Trump speak.
The response from the lefties was more of the same; what can I expect from them?
But when I listened to ‘consistent conservative’ Cruz, not to mention the other two people who were going for the highest office in the land?
Lip service to condemn the ‘protestors’ and then spending at least three times as much time attacking Trump (and, implied, the people who agree with Trump) and telling the world that Trump AND, implied, the people who just wanted to hear him speak had it coming. And worse, Cruz doubled down on his comments today.
What do you think is going to happen now that they not only see that these tactics work, but all three of Trump’s opponents on the political side are going to blame him for continued attacks while only paying lip service to rule of law?
IT WILL HAPPEN AGAIN.
And now, on top of all that, I have people who CLAIM to be conservatives taunting me and calling me a liar and nitpicking my posts in order to defend Cruz’s statements.
So, in retrospect, angry is not the word for what I’m feeling now.
I’m outraged.
Do you HONESTLY think he would come out and
be a Trump cheerleader when Trump attacks his character every freaking day? When you treat people like crap, there are consequences. I mean I thought LYIN TED had no credibility so why does Trump, or even you care for that matter?
Cheerleader?
CHEERLEADER?!
You don’t get it, do you!?
This isn’t political any more; this is about what’s RIGHT.
People had violence committed upon them last Friday. Look at the pictures. See the reports. SEE THE BLOOD.
All Cruz had to do was stop after his first two sentences and then gone on to chide Trump about his tone at a later time. Hell, it would have been fine if he’d just said NOTHING.
Instead what he did was to use these VICTIMS of leftist terror in order to try to score a cheap shot of victim-blaming.
If a bomb had gone off at one of Trump’s rallies and Cruz had rushed in front of a camera to tell the world that Trump deserved it because he was so ‘divisive,’ would you still be defending him?
Because this is the SAME DAMN THING.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
