[kabar]

But let’s discuss your apparent opinion that the solution for someone who violates your free speech rights is to commit violence against them. Please explain why you think that is a legitimate and legal and constitutionally correct solution. Enlighten us.

These thugs are not just exercising free speech, they are physically assaulting Trump supporters throwing punches, tearing up signs, etc. They are violent.

Remember: These are peaceful “protesters” expressing their First Amendment rights. At least that’s what the media and GOP elites will tell you.

[rodguy911]

Way to go Kabar these guys will never survive the daylight

[savedbygrace]

You are talking about two different issues. First, if there are no law enforcement personnel on site, then you have a right to defend yourself. If there ARE LEOs there, then they are the ones to deal with the thug.

But what has happened at Trump speeches is that he has told his followers to punch protesters, not for violence, but for protesting. That is not the correct response, especially if LEOs are present.

[Fishtalk]

I want to see every Republican elected guy out and screaming for these creeps to knock it off.

Damn....I’d like to see, maybe, Romney, just picking somebody at random.....perhaps castigating those that disrupt the political process....INSTEAD OF BEATING THE HELL OUR OF OUR OWN GUY!

I’m jus’ sayin’.

By the way...my book....I might call it “Thorn Birds II”.
\