Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Will88
The US population increase alone since the late '60s would require about a 60% increase in output, and that doesn't even include more consumption per capita and all the new products that didn't exist then.

That also assumes -- incorrectly -- that the consumption per capita of all these new products would be higher without imports. I don't think that's the case at all.

184 posted on 03/13/2016 11:36:41 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (Bye bye, William Frawley!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
That also assumes -- incorrectly -- that the consumption per capita of all these new products would be higher without imports. I don't think that's the case at all.

No, it does not assume what you say it assumes at all. The population increase is a stand alone factor. Then there are other factors such as new products and increased consumption and manufactured products per capita.

186 posted on 03/13/2016 11:45:14 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson