Posted on 03/12/2016 5:47:03 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Russias advanced RS-26 intercontinental ballistic missile has raised admiring eyebrows of military experts everywhere, the official Rossiiskaya Gazeta newspaper wrote.
“Russia’s new RS-26 missile travels along a continuously changing trajectory and as such it has no analogues in the world,” the expert said.
When asked about the US missile defense system, he said that it was “absolutely useless” against the RS-26.
“This one is even better than the famous Topol-M missile… Its warheads are supersonic and change their course all the time. Some of them will penetrate any existing missile defense shield and will hit their target,” the expert added.
When asked whether the new Russian ICBM had caught the Americans flatfooted, the expert said that not only the Americans were clueless but that the Chinese too now had something to worry about.
“Russia is 100-percent safe now, unlike everybody else,” he emphasized.
What makes the RS-26 so special is that even though it weighs just 80 tons, compared to the 120-ton heft of its RS-24 Yars predecessor, the Rubezh packs a frightening 1,2 megatons into its four 300 kiloton warheads.
With a potential range of 11,000 kilometers the RS-26 can hit targets all across the United States.
Moreover, its booster stage is down to under five minutes, which means that NATO radars in Europe will have no time to register the launch.
Adding to NATO air defenders’ worries, during the descending section of its trajectory, with only a few hundred kilometers left to the target, the missile’s warheads suddenly take a dive, lose altitude, and continue the approach as a cruise missile.
These new Russian ICBM warheads were developed in response to America’s plans to deploy a global missile defense system along Russia's borders.
The RS-26 Rubezh is expected to become operational in 2016.
Really? So we’re back to MAD? Sux.
Later
Oh yeah? Well, the US is way ahead in military transgender accommodation.
Take THAT, Vlad.
“Really? So were back to MAD? Sux.”
MAD has always been the case. Our “missile defense” is only capable of stopping a few RVs, not hundreds or thousands. Nothing has changed.
Article is Russian propaganda, da comrade?
In Soviet Russia, missiles cruise you!
“Its warheads are supersonic and change their course all the time.”
Would love to learn how they pull that trick off. Are they piloted? Do they have thrust on board?
Maybe this will wake up our youth, if they don’t scramble to their “safe” places. Expect the next headline to announce sales of this middle to Iran.
If they are, I would say they have some rather dumb pilots. Kind of reminds me of Slim Pickens. 😀
This is scary even if it’s partially true as Obama tears down our military.
We’ll get caught with our pants down.
They would have to have thrust on board. I noticed the missile weight dropped from 120 tons to 80 tons. Makes you wonder where they put the reaction mass.
It is likely a paper missile.
I could see pop out winglets/control surfaces, deployed after reentry.
2. Obama swallows.
“I could see pop out winglets/control surfaces, deployed after reentry.”
At supersonic speeds? They’d have to be damned robust to survive and be of any use at all. And how much control could they really have? The friction involved would light them up like road flares to IR sensors.
L
You do realize that Sputnik News is owned and operated by the Russian government...
I wouldn’t trust a word they print...
“Really? So were back to MAD? Sux.”
No, most likely we already have this technology and the
Obama gave it to them. We probably have a deterrent for it
and the Obama has probably gave that to them as well.
We never left MAD. Obama has probably cemented it in for
the next 100 years.
“The friction involved would light them up like road flares to IR sensors.”
RVs already look like meteors from reentry friction. They reenter at around Mach 15 or higher.
It wouldn’t take much to throw off our interceptors, which assume a straight ballistic trajectory and have to impact the target directly - no explosion.
What’s this number 4 new ICBM in the past few years.
We’ve retaliated with our own upgrades.
Namely the ....... chirp, chirp
Has it been named “Red October”?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.