Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex

From her statement, it sounds like she is guilty of the charge, and she is proud of what she did.


3 posted on 03/09/2016 6:27:15 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PAR35

Why shouldn’t she be proud of serving her country that was invaded?


4 posted on 03/09/2016 6:29:25 PM PST by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: PAR35

Really? Do you think she targeted those two journalists through her bombsight?


8 posted on 03/09/2016 7:17:04 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: PAR35

Here are my questions:

1) Why is she being held illegally in Russia?

2) Since she committed no crime in Russia where does Russia get off trying her for a “crime” supposedly committed in Ukraine?

3) She is a military officer and was seized in uniform by Russian regulars and pro-Russian irregulars. Where in law do they have the authority to send her to a foreign country?

4) Is she being tried by a military court? After all she is a military officer and was seized in uniform and during combat?

5) The two “reporters” were killed in a mortar attack on a rebel checkpoint. How is being unfortunate enough to get yourself killed in combat in a war zone while hanging out with rebels a crime on her part?

6) If the billing data from her phone is correct - and it is because how could it not be - then she was seized one hour before the mortar attack so why is she under arrest then?

7) Why are the Russian lying and saying she voluntarily crossed the border as a refugee when they earlier reported they had captured her?

8) Why are the Russians resorting to their old commie trick of sending people who oppose them for “forensic psychological” stays in mental hospitals with this woman?

9) If they believed she needed a month long stay in a mental hospital, how could they turn around and assume or pretend she was competent for trial?

10) Why does the official Russian investigation report claim she voluntarily walked across the border - which makes no sense to anyone - when the Donetsk rebel entity said the exact opposite was the case from the very beginning? Who’s more trustworthy - those who did the capturing and delivering over to Russia of this woman AND ADMITTED IT FROM THE BEGINNING of the lying sack-o-crap Russians who had to back falsify their own official statements and media reports after the fact?

You tell me since you’re such an expert on the case.


16 posted on 03/09/2016 8:19:14 PM PST by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson