I’ll grant that after reading that, but the “mixeds “ in it seem like they’re actually a positive outcome for him, and the losses on the DP cases are pretty sorry ass excuses for a justice system IMO...
I think it is a good accomplishment to argue before the Supreme Court and prevail. Would I necessarily want every attorney who had done that to be president?
So yes, it is certainly something few people do, but this is still a freshman Senator. He hasn’t really accomplished a lot as a Senator. In fact Ted hasn’t done all that much that you can point to and say, “Yep, now that’s presidential.”
He may be a nice guy. He may have accomplished some things. He may even have a good grasp of the U. S. Constitution. Does that make him presidential?
I remain unconvinced that Ted is all that.
Some folks think he is all that and more.