There is no one listening to Ted now. They never really were.
He didn’t catch the drift soon enough, that people were in no mood to hear anyone drone on about the weeds of policy, showing off their best debate tone, like Hillary and Ted.
Neither one of them got it.
Voters are past that and into lobbing pitchforks.
We can no longer make heads nor tails of DC policy anymore and DC wants it that way, and we have effectively been silenced and stalled off from effecting any change.
People are just voting for Ted against someone else, but not in enough numbers to make a difference in outcome.
There has to be outright theft to plop Cruz into the nomination. He knows that by now, and clearly he seems to be all for it.
You are 100% correct!
I don’t like seeing him take advantage of Romney and the willingness of the GOPe to corrupt the process for him, by default.
Under normal circumstances, every knows they don’t want him either. None the less he’ll watch them carve up Trump, just missing completely that he will be carved up next.
He should avoid being a part of that, first because it’s wrong, and secondly because he’s a fool to think he’ll be spared the same treatment.
If you get people who don’t vote on policy, you’re going to get bad policy, or the policy elites and the upper class like Trump want.
Voting on emotion, just like doing anything in life based on emotion, is a recipe for disaster and huge regrets later on.
If Trump had ideas on how to fix the country, he’d offer them. Instead he offers no substance and just lobs insults and attacks at people. That stirs up “anger” in people. I can’t think of a worse quality to inspire in people than anger. And I can’t think of a worse quality for a leader to have. Voting on anger alone is how you get a vindictive strongman in office who tramples on human rights.