Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyX

I’ve always had the opinion that the electronic voting machines should only be used to generate paper ballots that the voter can inspect prior to be turned in for counting. Counting can then be done by another machine, with appropriate audit controls to ensure that the count matches the ballots.

An election without a paper trail and auditability cannot ever be trusted.


5 posted on 03/06/2016 4:53:59 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom
An election without a paper trail cannot be trusted

That should be a no-brainer. There's NOTHING that's done with technology that can't be hacked. It's incomprehensible that there is no paper trail (and I don't me chad-type ballots).

The other thing is I never realized that there isn't some kind of secret ballot at caucuses. A private voting process is central to our freedoms. What does a caucus do? It starts the presidential selection process with a system where voters are vulnerable to peer and family pressure, and there's no control over local manipulation of voters.

11 posted on 03/06/2016 5:13:53 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: exDemMom

At least here in some parts of Gnu Yak we fill out a paper ballot then put it in the scanner...there is a paper trail, but I still miss the old machines, they were built like fortresses and you knew the count was right..


14 posted on 03/06/2016 5:54:47 AM PST by Shady (We are at war again......this time for our lives...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson