Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gaffer
The TOP SECRET information had to come from another network much more secure like JWICS, and there is NO DOUBT there were deliberate actions taken to circumvent its protections.

Politics aside, I think this whole episode illustrates the chaotic way data is classified and handled.

As I understand it the State Department email system that Hillary was supposed to use isn't cleared for classified data either. Does anyone doubt that there are millions of emails on that system containing the same kind of classified data found in her emails?

If Hillary had used the DOS email system and received the same emails she would be just as guilty.

I think the private server thing is a bit of a red herring.

31 posted on 03/03/2016 6:39:14 AM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: semimojo

It is true, either way, an unclassified network of whatever pedigree cannot be used to transmit classified information.

The point here is that this ‘woman’ intentionally set up, operated and HID a private network which did not come under the normal scrutiny unclassified DOS email would. NOR WOULD THERE BE ANY RECORD OF IT available to anyone except through HER or her lawyers (with plenty of time to slash and burn).

The very fact it was SHE who had the ability to delete emails of any flavor is the base reason she set up the network. To be able to erase incriminating evidence if she was found out. So, in my opinion, the “private server thing” is DEFINITELY NOT a red herring.


32 posted on 03/03/2016 6:47:47 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo
Politics aside, I think this whole episode illustrates the chaotic way data is classified and handled. I have dealt with classified information ever since I was 18 ears old up through today. The system isn't chaotic. It depends on honorable people who have been vetted to be such. The problem comes when dishonorable people are "vetted" by politics and favoritism and 'nomination' to high office. They are above the law in their eyes and those rules, regulations and safeguards are only impediments to their own ulterior dishonest and disreputable goals.
34 posted on 03/03/2016 6:51:04 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo

Creating and using the private server shows intent. She went out of her way to break the rules.


37 posted on 03/03/2016 6:57:58 AM PST by MortMan (Let's call the push for amnesty what it is: Pedrophilia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson