The New York Times abandoned its ethics to take down Trump

NY Post ^ | March 2, 2016 | Michael Goodwin

[McGruff]

For decades, the editorial page of The New York Times has served as the propaganda arm of the Democratic Party. But in a sign of the left’s panic over Donald Trump, the Times has moved beyond pushing an agenda to becoming a political hack, dirty tricks and all.

That’s the only reasonable conclusion to draw from the fishy aftermath of a Trump meeting with the edit board. The meeting happened in early January, but only on the eve of Super Tuesday did word spread about something the leading Republican candidate supposedly said in an off-the-record segment.

Buzzfeed suggested that an audiotape reveals Trump “secretly” walking back some of his most forceful immigration positions. The online news outlet reported that the recording has “reached near-mythical status at the Times” and that “some” people there believe the contents “could deal a serious blow” to Trump if they were made public.

[Conservative Gato]

Right now,it’s doing him damage.

I seriously doubt that. We've seen this so many times with the enemedia, outright lying and crying wolf, that it's hard to believe anything these outlets put out.

FWIW, if it was so damaging, why didn't they just release it? Oh yeah, "it's the seriousness of the charge" that very well may be at play here that the enemedia has been known to do so often. Why would anyone take this enemy of America, seriously? Until they put it out there for all to see, all you are doing is helping them put out their narrative: "it's the seriousness of the charge".

CGato

[timestax]

[timestax]