Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/02/2016 4:39:53 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin
Here's another big loser:


2 posted on 03/02/2016 4:45:00 AM PST by Byron_the_Aussie (Michelle Obama, The Early Years: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBYGxBlFOSU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

‘When the dust settles on this wild and wacky GOP primary season, there will be at least one clear Biggest Loser: the Republican National Committee.’

When a party of elected officials decides it no longer selects to represent the will of the people who put them in office, they really should - indeed, they must - lose.


3 posted on 03/02/2016 4:52:38 AM PST by Jack Hammer (uff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Interesting body language in the above photo. Carson, Trump, and Kasich all are in a neutral pose; looking straight ahead; hands at their side. Rubio and Cruz have their hands clasped in front; a sign they want to portray confidence, but they feel vulnerable. Rubio’s interlaced fingers are an indication of frustration, hostility.

http://bodylanguageproject.com/nonverbal-dictionary/


6 posted on 03/02/2016 5:08:02 AM PST by Flick Lives (One should not attend even the end of the world without a good breakfast. -- Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin; Byron_the_Aussie; Jack Hammer; captmar-vell
from the article: "When the dust settles on this wild and wacky GOP primary season, there will be at least one clear Biggest Loser: the Republican National Committee."

Are you 100% certain?
Let me suggest that people much smarter than I, who understand both media and politics, are very happy that Republican debates draw all-time record viewers, and these are today translating into all-time record Republican primary voters.

All these new voters seem "mad as hell, and not going to take it any more" -- and what are they mad at?
Well, for one thing, the insanely biased anti-Republican media which they can see most clearly at work in the candidate debates.

So, can somebody explain how, exactly, that's a bad thing?

10 posted on 03/02/2016 5:31:41 AM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Good. The RNC has been needing some serious changes for at least 30 years.


11 posted on 03/02/2016 5:36:56 AM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

great article by ms. malkin !


12 posted on 03/02/2016 7:03:12 AM PST by chatham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

That’s OK as Trump will own the RNC come 1/17!


14 posted on 03/02/2016 7:52:10 AM PST by Harpotoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson