Posted on 03/01/2016 9:58:10 AM PST by wagglebee
STOCKHOLM, Sweden, February 29, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) -- Last week the youth wing of Sweden’s Liberal Party voted to call for the decriminalization of sexual relations between siblings as well as sexual relations with a corpse, on the argument that laws should not be based on “morality” or on a societal consensus on what is “disgusting.”
“We are a youth organization and one of our tasks is to think one step further,” said Liberal Youth leader Cecilia Johnsson to Swedish news site Aftonbladet last week.
“I understand that [incest and necrophilia] can be seen as unusual and disgusting but legislation can not be based on it being disgusting,” she said, adding, “We don’t like morality laws in general and this legislation is not protecting anyone right now.”
The motion filed states that sex between two consenting siblings 15 years of age and older should be allowed and that sex with a dead body should also be allowed as long as the deceased gave written permission prior to passing.
“You should get to decide what happens to your body after you die, and if it happens to be that someone wants to bequeath their body to a museum or for research, or if they want to bequeath it to someone for sex, then it should be okay,” Johnsson said.
Maria Hildingsson, Secretary General of the Federation of Catholic Family Associations in Europe, commented to LifeSiteNews by email that with the proposals, “absurdity has reached a new level in Sweden.”
Stefan Gustavsson, Secretary General of the Swedish Evangelical Alliance, called the proposals for incest and necrophilia the “logical consequence” of a society that has jettisoned the natural purpose of sexuality within marriage between a man and woman and opened it up to other interpretations, such as same-sex “marriage.”
“You cannot simply say there is something wrong with the youth wing of the Liberal party. We must also realize that there is something wrong with how we as a culture thinks about sexuality when we see that our thinking results in incest and necrophilia," he said.
Senior party officials are distancing themselves from the youth wing over the proposal, calling them “nitwits,” and telling them that people are “laughing at your liberalism.”
They must be trying to develop a lega system more disgusting than Sharia!
I guess when the Muslims rape Swedish natives that cannot be condemned because laws “should not be based on morality.
This dingbat would be singing a much different tune if she were sexually molested/sexually abused by her father or brother or uncle ........
Incest is destructive to the victim, period. It destroys the beauty and sanctity of sex, especially in the context of marriage later on in life.
Women who are sexually abused/molested as children are often INCAPABLE of having what can even be remotely construed as being normal, sexual relationships with their husbands. They compartmentalize it into "just sex" and more often than not fail to have that unique, God given bond with their husbands of "making love." Because of this, they miss out on the most beautiful aspect of a God blessed marriage.
Want to absolutely destroy women? Legalize incest. That'll do it.
It has been since Adam and Eve ate from the tree of knowledge, my friend.
Should please the islamics.
“as long as the deceased gave written permission prior to passing”
I’d like to see that one challenged in court:
Defense attorney: “Miss, this is your signature on this permission note, is it not?”
Witness: (lip falls off)
I seen what you did there.
L
BTTT!
“Legalize incest and necrophilia....... so they can have sex with their dead sister”
Homosexual, incestuous, necrophilia ....... so they can have sex with their dead brother/father, sister/mother
Two homos stopped in front of the morgue and one said “Hey, wanna stop in for a cold one?”
The Swedes deserve the muslims.
That’s a relatively dead issue
Sure...why not?
F—k whatever you want.
Why should anyone tell you where to stick the twig and where not to? Same goes the other way: if it fits, its all good....
My God: we have lost our minds and souls.
Indeed.
This reminds me of the sole time I ever wrote a response to a student editorial at the university where I teach (which response was published by the student newspaper, and won the approval not only of other pro-life conservatives on campus, but of a few leftish colleagues and one of the liberal protestant campus ministers). Some nitwitted journalism major was making the same nonsensical point, and I dressed her down, pointing out that all laws embody moral judgements (giving a long list of those instantiating “Thou shalt not steal”).
A dead person has no sexuality. Therefore, it is impossible to have sex with a dead person’s body.
Any comments from Cecilia’s sister?
Well isn’t that nice (/s).
“The motion filed states ... and that sex with a dead body should also be allowed as long as the deceased gave written permission prior to passing.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.