I really, really doubt this is a change in allegiance. It is a political play to sabotage the republican nomination process.
They aren’t coordinated enough to pull that off ..this is organic and genuine ...nice try though
I was thinking the same. This is reminiscent of Mississippi.
Exactly.
Agreed. a ‘16 version of Rush’s “Operation Chaos”.
The resultant problem would be the unions really putting the screws on people in November in response to a strong Trump primary win, and people not voting for him in the general as a result. I've talked to union guys who are quite convinced that somehow, someway, the union bigwigs get a list of how members voted, by name...And in Massachusetts, I wouldn't be particularly shocked if they really do.
“I really, really doubt this is a change in allegiance. It is a political play to sabotage the republican nomination process.”
I echo your thoughts
I too agree with your thoughts.
How in the heck do 20,000 people do something like this without it being in social media chatter weeks and months before Jan 1 with democrats expressing disenchantment? 20,000 voters times the people they share their thoughts with and nobody picked up on this until after the fact. I don't think so.
You said...
“Who this group votes for will show us who they want facing Hillary in the general election.
I really, really doubt this is a change in allegiance. It is a political play to sabotage the republican nomination process.”
Could be.
We’ll find out in November