Posted on 02/29/2016 10:39:41 AM PST by Kaslin
Note: This is not an institutional endorsement. Each writer at Hot Air has their own conscience and freedom to decide on their favored candidate. This post reflects only my opinion, not those of my colleagues at either Hot Air, Townhall, or of Salem Media Group.
Several months ago, readers began peppering me and other writers at Hot Air about which Republican candidate we would support in the primaries. For my part, I have learned to wait until the vote takes place. Candidates drop out or make themselves unpalatable over the arc of a primary season, and this has been especially true for this cycle. The GOP boom in two-term governors turned out to be mostly a bust; Scott Walker’s lack of traction turned out to be one of the bigger disappointments of 2015. At various points, however, I have promised to disclose my choice when Minnesota holds its caucuses.
Tomorrow, that day arrives, but ironically, I won’t be there. My CPAC travel plans and Going Red promotion efforts require me to arrive in Washington DC early this week, and I will be out of town tomorrow night when the caucuses take place — and one has to be present to vote. Still, the spirit of that commitment requires me to make a choice and disclose it. And that choice is Senator Marco Rubio.
This was actually a very tough decision, and it came down to Rubio and Senator Ted Cruz. In fact, it was so tough that it took the most recent debate to make the choice. Both men have admirable qualities that make them good choices for the GOP nomination. Neither of them are perfect. Under the best circumstances, I would prefer a seasoned Republican governor with a solid track record of conservative policy accomplishments who could represent the future of the party. While Governor John Kasich has done well in Ohio, there are other reasons for reservations about his candidacy, especially his embrace of bad policy in the Medicaid expansion of ObamaCare — and the manner in which he lashed out at conservative critics of that policy. That leaves the two first-term Senators — both of whom arrived as conservative insurgents — as the best of the field.
Both Rubio and Cruz have had high and low points in Washington. Rubio’s low point came with the Gang of Eight bill, which he admits now was a mistake. Cruz led a poorly conceived shutdown over the fantasy demand that Barack Obama sign a budget defunding ObamaCare, which ended up leaving Republicans on the defensive in 2013 and nearly overshadowed a catastrophic failure in the program’s rollout. Neither of these mistakes did any long-term damage, but the two mistakes reflect a key difference between the two candidates. Rubio tried too hard to work with others and made a bad deal but eventually recognized that, while Cruz doesn’t work well even with members of his own party and makes the kind of impossible-to-keep promises that end up disillusioning voters.
One major reservation for supporting candidates in the Senate is that they don’t have a track record of accomplishment on which to rely. However, one accomplishment highlights the differences between the candidates most keenly on the issue of ObamaCare and demonstrates Rubio’s effectiveness in his Senate perch. Cruz led the aforementioned failed shutdown that accomplished nothing except a few news cycles that focused on closed facilities more than the epic HHS failure in October 2013. John Kasich has bought into ObamaCare with the Medicaid expansion. Donald Trump has praised the individual mandate against which conservatives have fought for years, and keeps going back and forth on single-payer health care.
Rubio, on the other hand, saw a way to block crony payoffs to the insurance companies that pushed for that mandate with the restriction on funds for “risk corridor” payments. Rubio demanded a rider on the 2013 “cromnibus” that blocked general-fund payouts under that program, limiting them to taxes collected specifically for that function. Rubio’s effort remains the only effective Republican legislative limitation of ObamaCare since its March 2010 passage, and the one that has pushed most of the government “co-ops” out of business.
While conservative policy would be served well by both men, the approach to conservatism and inclusion is perhaps the most important quality in my choice. Cruz, as solid a conservative as anyone could want in the Senate, has run his primary campaign on the basis of ideological purity. Cruz has repeatedly argued, especially in regard to Rubio, that he’s not just the most conservative candidate in the race but the only conservative in the race. That portends an insular, base-driven campaign that simply will not work in swing states any longer. The last base election success came in 2004, and that was in support of a wartime incumbent against a largely inept challenger. Rubio, on the other hand, has run a campaign predicated on broadening the party by selling conservative policies in communities largely ignored by the Republican Party over the last several decades. While Cruz could improve turnout performance in deep-red states with an ideological campaign, Rubio’s approach holds the most promise in states like Florida, Ohio, North Carolina, Colorado, and Virginia — states the GOP must win in November.
For those who look at a track record of taking on the “establishment,” both Cruz and Rubio offer hope. Both ran for the US Senate against the will of GOP leadership, and both won impressive victories. However, Rubio ran against popular incumbent governor Charlie Crist and beat him so badly in the primary that Crist left the party — and Rubio wound up winning 49% of the general-election vote in purple-state Florida in a three-way race, beating Crist by 19 points and Democrat Kendrick Meek by 29 points. Rubio won his Senate seat in a tough environment and in a key swing state for November, even while holding fast to conservative policies.
With all of that said, both Rubio and Cruz represent the future of the Republican Party and an opportunity to broaden the reach of conservatism. I would be happy to see either man win the nomination — but a choice has to be made. Marco Rubio gives Republicans and conservatives not just their best opportunity to win, but their best chance to effectively implement conservative policies by creating the best coattails down the ticket in November. That is why Senator Rubio is my choice for the primaries.
Scamnesty.
Another first term sexually ambiguous senator? No thanks.
Ed Morrisey’s Endorsement: No one cares.
By the way, who is ed morrisey?
Ed thinks the status quo is just fine.
Disappointing but not important to the race.
The reason you support Rubio is because you are part of the establishment and want the cheap labor express to continue.
I asked this of you a few days ago and did not get an answer - who do you support?
Bio: http://premierespeakers.com/ed_morrissey/bio
If you can find any reference to this guy having attended college, even, it would perhaps give him some credibilty. He sure doesn't mention it, or anything else that he's done that would make him an expert on anything. As far as I can tell he's got a thinner resume than even Dana Loesch, who's claim to fame is college droput "mom blogger". Honestly, I do not understand why anyone pays these people the slightest bit of attention. Media outlets have space and time to fill and I guess this is how the fill it.
Ed Morrisey has always been an establishment weenie.
I hear this guy on NRA radio sometimes. He has failed to impress me with his political commentary.
When you have a Government that is not run by the people, for the people and of the people, you do not have a Country...
When you have a Government that doesn’t listen to what the people are saying and wanting done to make a Nation better, you do not have a Country...
When you have a Government that sends all of the manufacturing and jobs for the people of the country to foreign countries, you do not have a Country for it’s people...
When you have a Government that will allow anyone from anywhere to come into a Country without protecting its citizens first and foremost, you do not have a Country...
When you have a Government that takes away any of your freedoms, healthcare, economy, protection, you do not have a Country...
When you cannot find enough money to live on because your Government is funding foreign countries first, you do not have a Country...
When a Government will not abide by the Constitution it was given to follow, you do not have a Country...
When you have a Government that won’t allow people to honor their religion, you do not have a Country...
Therefore, in the situation we are in today at this present time, we have one person who is an American, born on American Soil, and has built the American Dream for us to follow will give this Country back to it’s people where it belongs...
And that person is Donald J. Trump....
He thinks small. I heard him on NRA radio last week talking about his latest book which is apparently about republicans winning the election by flipping a few strategic counties. I guess he never thought of appealing to more people by changing the entire message as Trump has.
That Marco Rubio has a 100% Approval rating from the National Right To Life comittee-positions in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2013-2014 (113th Congress full session) 2014 and 2015 National right to life positions means absolutely nothing to you.
Neither does his Zero percent approval rating from Planned Butcherhood ans NARAL Pro Choice from 2010 to 2016, his 100 percent approval ratings from the international warehouse logistic association position, his zero percent rating from the American Communist Liars Union (ACLU) positions, his 100% Americans for prosperity ratings, his 100% appoval rating for Americans for Americans position, his 100% National tax limitation committee position, his 100% approval rating from the Gun Owners of America , his zero percent rating from the NEA (National Education Association positions, his 100% approval ratings fromm the Workplace-choice position, His 100% approval rating from the American Family Association-position, 100% FRC positions, 100% Family reseach council, 100% Eagle Forum, positions, 100% Campaign for working Family positions, 100% Christian Coalition of America position
his 100% approval rating from the American Family Association position, his 100% rating from Christian coalition of America, positions, He received a 100% approval rating from American Family Association positiona as socially conservative, his 100% approval National Tax limitation committee position,
There are many more conservative positions he received 100% or just below 100 percent approval rating, but the only thin that matters to you is that he was one of the 8 gang members which he admitted was a big mistake.
Everything else does not matter to you. :(
Isn’t it intreting how all the bloggers, pundits and assorted “Moveemnt Conservatives” are lying up with the GOP Establishement.
One good thing about this year is all the rats have been flushed from the party woodwork.
Let me guess. This Ed guy is a fan of foam parties?
I will vote Clinton before I vote Rubio.
Best of luck.
If possible, I think I'll skip that future and maybe other voters will, too.
Personally, I've got enough problems already and thanks a bunch for all of that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.