Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HomerBohn

That assumes that future state primary voters, currently supporting Trump, would rush to Romney over Trump.

What states would a new Romney entry win that Cruz/Kasich/Rubio would NOT win? What states would Romney take away from Trump?

Romney wasn't soaring in 2012. His entry would likely be met with as little enthusiasm as the reruns of Huckabee and Santorum were in Iowa this year.

March 2016 GOP Primary Dates & Delegates

Election Day

Cumulative

Cumulative

Total

March Only

Total w/ previous 133

1-Mar

624

624

757

5-Mar

154

778

911

8-Mar

149

927

1060

12-Mar

28

955

1088

13-Mar

33

988

1121

15-Mar

358

1346

1479

22-Mar

98

1444

1577


Needed to win 1237

Estimates are that Trump will pick up around 2/3 of the delegates tomorrow (SuperTuesday). Add those to his current 82 would show him about 416 + 82 = 498.

Even is only one candidate won the remaining 1/3, he would only pick up 208. Of course that will not happen and the remaining 1/3 will be split among Cruz/Rubio/Kasich/Carson.

That puts Trump nearly 300 delegates ahead of the combined delegates of the others.

If Trump wins 2/3 of all of the March delegates, that would give him around 962. Add those he already has and that puts him at 962 + 82 current = 1044. That means he has to pick up around 193 delegates in April-May-June to reach the magic number.

Another problem with a late Romney entry is the Rule #40 that candidates must win 50% of the delegates in at least 8 states to be allowed to have their names put in nomination at the Convention.

What states would Romney (or any of the other candidates) win by 50% over Trump? Trump will likely have at least 8 such states after tomorrow.

The numbers do not seem to be there for Cruz, Rubio, Kasich, Carson, nor Romney.


64 posted on 02/29/2016 8:17:06 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TomGuy

Trump will not win 2/3 of the delegates tomorrow. These are not winner-take-all states, but mostly proportional. Some (like Texas) are partially based on the entire state’s vote and partially on a per Congressional District basis. Trump will do well to get 1/2 of the votes...

...but even given that, your thesis holds: Trump will be the victor. There is simply no one who can stop him at this point - “they” waited too long to do anything about him, content to wait for Trump to implode. They didn’t calculate a very ticked off electorate that was sick and tired of them and their usual shennanigans.

I, personally, don’t know how Romney even will be allowed to register in most states - filing deadlines have passed in most cases. He has no organization to speak of right now, and by the time that March 15 rolls around, I believe that Carson and Cruz - at a minimum - will be out of the race. Rubio is likely to leave if he cannot win his own state (particularly without Bush there to split FL voters). So, who is left? No one. The only “hope” of the anti-Trumpers is an independent run by someone. Bloomberg would, IMHO, take more votes from Hillary than from Trump, especially in the NY area. At best we might - from the perspective of the GOPe - be looking at no one earning 270 Electoral Votes...and that’s a whole new ballgame.


99 posted on 02/29/2016 10:07:09 AM PST by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson