Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conservative98

So only pro trump articles allowed in breaking?


7 posted on 02/28/2016 10:39:13 AM PST by DrewsMum (If they wanted a conservative, they'd vote for one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: DrewsMum

I’ve noticed that as well.


107 posted on 02/28/2016 11:57:02 AM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: DrewsMum
So only pro trump articles allowed in breaking?

Yes. Understand, and you will be much easier to deal with.

130 posted on 02/28/2016 2:03:50 PM PST by Lazamataz (I'm an Islamophobe??? Well, good. When it comes to Islam, there's plenty to Phobe about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: DrewsMum

See my post immediately above. Tapper/CNN “pushed” the story. David Duke is on record as saying he did NOT endorse Trump. It was all a trap to try to grab airwaves and anti-Trump on a rather slow newsday.


181 posted on 02/28/2016 11:36:27 PM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: DrewsMum

“So only pro trump articles allowed in breaking?”

After tomorrow... that’s a great idea.

Presuming Trump nails it tomorrow, wouldn’t it be nice if Free Republic STOPPED looking like a democrat website determined to destroy the Republican candidate? Just a thought, there.


187 posted on 02/29/2016 9:14:22 AM PST by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson