Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY Times Bombshell Scoop: Fox News Colluded with Rubio to Give Amnesty to Illegal Aliens
Breitbart News ^ | Feb 27 2016 | Breitbart News

Posted on 02/27/2016 10:16:35 PM PST by MichelleWSC3

A few weeks after Senator Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) 79% joined a bipartisan push for an immigration overhaul in 2013, he arrived alongside Senator Chuck Schumer at the executive dining room of News Corporation’s Manhattan headquarters for dinner.

Their mission was to persuade Rupert Murdoch, the owner of the media empire, and Roger Ailes, the chairman and chief executive of its Fox News division, to keep the network’s on-air personalities from savaging the legislation and give it a fighting chance at survival.

Mr. Murdoch, an advocate of immigration reform, and Mr. Ailes, his top lieutenant and the most powerful man in conservative television, agreed at the Jan. 17, 2013, meeting to give the senators some breathing room.

But the media executives, highly attuned to the intensifying anger in the Republican grass roots, warned that the senators also needed to make their case to Rush Limbaugh, the king of conservative talk radio, who held enormous sway with the party’s largely anti-immigrant base.

The dinner at News Corporation headquarters — which has not been previously reported — and the subsequent outreach to Mr. Limbaugh illustrate the degree to which Mr. Rubio served as the chief envoy to the conservative media for the group supporting the legislation. The bill would have provided a pathway to American citizenship for 11 million illegal immigrants along with measures to secure the borders and ensure that foreigners left the United States upon the expiration of their visas.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; fox; foxnews; illegalaliens; illegals; jedijonestrolling; limbaugh; rubio; rushlimbaugh; talkradio; trump; trumpwasright
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-357 next last
To: MichelleWSC3

More validation for my decision to delete Fox news from my life. They are now dead to me.


21 posted on 02/27/2016 10:57:46 PM PST by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

GOP needs to cancel this debate


22 posted on 02/27/2016 10:57:54 PM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

Too many conflicts of interests


23 posted on 02/27/2016 10:58:31 PM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

Should be interesting Chris Wallace Show Sunday


24 posted on 02/27/2016 10:59:40 PM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: onyx

All the radio hosts were in on this?!
I’m turning off the radio.


25 posted on 02/27/2016 11:00:18 PM PST by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
FOX News is team Rubio’s media wing. It is 24/7 pro-Rubio and anti-others, especially Cruz.

Really? then why is cruz teaming-up with rubio?
26 posted on 02/27/2016 11:00:27 PM PST by JoSixChip (Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - He's creepy and he's kooky, mysterious and spooky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MichelleWSC3
We trust the New York Times?

The sources used are:

"None of the attendees agreed to be identified for this article because the conversations were supposed to be confidential." PS I am 100% voting Trump. But Sorry I dont trust the NY Times.

27 posted on 02/27/2016 11:00:55 PM PST by NoLibZone (I voted for Mitt. The lesser of 2 evils religious argument put a black Muzzi nationalist in the W.H.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichelleWSC3

I sort of thought something was about to break. Rubik has been acting like a 12 yr old since the day before the last debate. Constantly repeatedly himself and the comment about Trump’s face was something you’d hear in a kindergarten


28 posted on 02/27/2016 11:01:12 PM PST by Doogle (( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Totally disgusted! And, the stupid talking heads wonder why voters are angry??


29 posted on 02/27/2016 11:01:36 PM PST by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PA Engineer

So who was a source at the dinner meeting that leaked? Was it perhaps Christie? Why is this story coming out now? It slams Rubio, a globalist. NYT wouldn’t really have a problem with a globalist uniparty member running the WH.

Was it to slam Fox news and conservative pundits? There is that angle to drive an effective wedge.

Who benefits? Trump it would seem, But he is not a favorite of the NYT.

So who benefits. Not Cruz...NYT detests Cruz more than Trump.

The whole story is interesting indeed.


30 posted on 02/27/2016 11:03:37 PM PST by abigkahuna (How can you be at two places at once when you are nowhere at all?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: onyx; Amntn; PJBankard; nikos1121

Not sure who is on onyx list. Sorry if you got double pinged but it’s important !


31 posted on 02/27/2016 11:03:38 PM PST by hoosiermama (Make America Great Again by uniting Great Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jrabbit
We trust the New York Times?

It makes total sense now

32 posted on 02/27/2016 11:04:10 PM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

The Slimes cannot be trusted but we need to verify the information presented. Ask Rush if this is true, let him confirm or deny.


33 posted on 02/27/2016 11:05:57 PM PST by SteveSCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

He is not teaming up with Rubio. You manufactured that out of nothing.

Cruz said in several of the debates that “any of these candidates would be better than Hillary.” Now he says Rubio would be better than Trump. So? That is not teaming up. And if it were (it is not), that has nothing to do with Fox News. Fox News has treated and is treating Cruz horribly. Not a drop of fairness and balance in them.


34 posted on 02/27/2016 11:06:02 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

They will not they are using everything to take trump down.

Their power is threatened. Goper rino vichy repubs want to stay in power.


35 posted on 02/27/2016 11:06:14 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 1_Rain_Drop

Well, well, well.
Lots of damage control will be going on for many “conservative” radio talking heads in the next 48 hours.

Monday radio should be entertaining.


36 posted on 02/27/2016 11:07:00 PM PST by sillsfan (Reagan and Sarah are right- WE win, they lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MichelleWSC3
The bill would have provided a pathway to American citizenship for 11 million illegal immigrants . . .

They keep using that number - as if it has any basis in reality.

37 posted on 02/27/2016 11:08:02 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abigkahuna
The whole story is interesting indeed.

I am also trying to figure out who is to gain from this. There are enough details to glean from the NYT narrative to answer a few questions. Maybe it is just confirmation of what we have already observed.

My takeaway at least in regards to talk radio is we are indeed the stupid party.
38 posted on 02/27/2016 11:09:20 PM PST by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media. #2ndAmendmentMatters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MichelleWSC3

When you see the word NEWS, 9 times out of 10 you should replace that word with PROPAGANDA.

ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, CNN, MSNBC, etc are not there to inform us, but to influence public opinion.


39 posted on 02/27/2016 11:09:23 PM PST by r_barton (GO TRUMP!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichelleWSC3

I am dumbfounded. The conservative pundits were involved, supported amnesty of the 30 to 50 million foreigners who came into the US illegally. (We all know the figure is not 11 million)!

So these cuckservative pundits supported the democrat/marxists in creating their leftist voting majority?

These cuckservative pundits have supported the left in opening our borders to all manner of horrific Third World violence, crime, and disease. They have betrayed their listeners by secretly being part of the New World Order cabal that supported and endorsed this agenda every single step of the way.

wow.


40 posted on 02/27/2016 11:09:52 PM PST by Lopeover (2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-357 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson