Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SkyPilot
I've read speculation that the way the gov would do it is to take a person's government sponsored retirement savings when they retire and shift them to an annuity. That way, the person would get a monthly payment based on age, but when they died, the gov got to keep the money. Thing is most people are dumb enough to buy into guaranteed income for life, so their retirement won't run out.

It would go along way down that slippery slope we're on of eliminating inheritance for middle-class people, thus further destroying the middle class.

6 posted on 02/27/2016 1:23:34 PM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: grania
person's government sponsored retirement savings

not sure what that term means?

9 posted on 02/27/2016 1:28:51 PM PST by nascarnation (RIP Scalia. Godspeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: grania

You are correct.


14 posted on 02/27/2016 1:49:04 PM PST by Rusty0604 (oh the stories I could tell. but I really don't think scalia's death is suspiciou.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: grania

The other possibility is requiring a small percentage, to start, of all retirement accounts to be invested in “safe” government bonds, because stock market swings destroy people’s retirements.
Then they slowly ramp up the mandatory percentage.


36 posted on 02/27/2016 4:07:43 PM PST by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: grania
...shift them to an annuity.

At current interest rates.

No thanks.

41 posted on 02/27/2016 4:29:12 PM PST by ChicagahAl (Today's Democrats are much more Fascist than Communist; but Sen Joe McCarthy was still right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson