Posted on 02/27/2016 12:04:06 PM PST by BlueNgold
The Convention Rules Committee can make changes, subject to approval by the convention as a whole.
What you did not write is that rules committe meets the week before the convention and they will change the rules to their liking. The rule you discuss was put in place all they way back in 2012 to keep Ron Paul’s name out of nomination.
The beauty of the “party” is that they can make up the rules that they want. If you don’t think so, just wait until Hillary is indicted. You will see the DNC do cartwheels.
Just another example of how big, centralized plans can have unintended consequences.
If the RNC can change the rules once, they can and more than likely will change them when it suits their needs.
Who in their right mind trusts those bastards we have elected? No wonder Trump is doing so well in this circus called an election.
>> I read 4 territories like Guam and Puerto Rico are included in that 8 state count. <<
There are 57 “state-like” delegations for the Dhimmis. But the GOP may have only 56. Dunno.
Anyway, here’s the DNC’s list —
1. the lower 48 states = 48 delegations
2. Hawaii and Alaska = 2 delegations
3. Am. Samoa, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, N. Marianas = 5 delegations
4. District of Columbia = 1 delegation
5. Americans Abroad = 1 delegation
Grand Total = 57
I am reading NV as:
14T, 6Cz, 7R, 1K, 2Ca
For a total of 30.
Thanks for the ping
Once the convention is underway, and somewhat before, the Convention Rules Committee takes precedence. Until then, the RNC can indeed to mount a suicide mission with unwarranted rule changes.
The important idea here is that rank-and-file GOP voters have allowed the RNC to bully them by not taking part in local GOP meetings that choose officers and platform proposals.
People who spend time and money for when the SHTF apparently won’t spend a few dozen hours a year preventing that from happening. As if a few minutes a decade in a voting booth could end in restrained government!
Link to the full set of rules for anyone interested...
https://cdn.gop.com/docs/2012_RULES_Adopted.pdf
Date |
State/ |
Calculated |
Type |
Allocation |
Cumulative |
territory |
delegates |
Total |
|||
1237 to Win |
|||||
February 1, 2016 |
Iowa |
30 |
Closed caucus |
prop |
30 |
February 9, 2016 |
New Hampshire |
23 |
Modified primary |
prop |
53 |
February 20, 2016 |
South Carolina |
50 |
Open primary |
w-t-all |
103 |
February 23, 2016 |
Nevada |
30 |
Closed caucus |
prop |
133 |
March 1, 2016 |
Alabama |
50 |
Open primary |
hyb |
183 |
Alaska |
28 |
Closed caucus |
prop |
211 |
|
Arkansas |
40 |
Open primary |
hyb |
251 |
|
Georgia |
76 |
Modified primary |
hyb |
327 |
|
Massachusetts |
42 |
Modified primary |
prop |
369 |
|
Minnesota |
38 |
Open caucus |
prop |
407 |
|
Oklahoma |
43 |
Closed primary |
hyb |
450 |
|
Tennessee |
58 |
Open primary |
hyb |
508 |
|
Texas |
155 |
Open primary |
hyb |
663 |
|
Vermont |
16 |
Open primary |
hyb |
679 |
|
Virginia |
49 |
Open primary |
prop |
728 |
|
Wyoming |
29 |
Closed caucus |
unbound |
757 |
|
March 5, 2016 |
Maine |
23 |
Closed caucus |
780 |
|
Kansas |
40 |
Closed caucus |
prop |
820 |
|
Kentucky |
45 |
Closed caucus |
prop |
865 |
|
Louisiana |
46 |
Closed primary |
prop |
911 |
|
March 8, 2016 |
Hawaii |
19 |
Closed caucus |
prop |
930 |
Idaho |
32 |
Closed primary |
hyb |
962 |
|
Mississippi |
39 |
Open primary |
prop |
1001 |
|
Michigan |
59 |
Closed primary |
prop |
1060 |
|
March 12, 2016 |
District of Columbia |
19 |
Closed caucus |
hyb |
1079 |
Guam |
9 |
Closed caucus |
1088 |
||
March 13, 2016 |
Puerto Rico |
23 |
Open primary |
1111 |
|
March 15, 2016 |
Ohio |
66 |
Modified primary |
w-t-all |
1177 |
Florida |
99 |
Closed primary |
w-t-all |
1276 |
|
Illinois |
69 |
Open primary |
w-t-all |
1345 |
|
Missouri |
52 |
Modified caucus |
w-t-all |
1397 |
|
North Carolina |
72 |
Modified primary |
prop |
1469 |
|
March 22, 2016 |
Arizona |
58 |
Closed primary |
prop |
1527 |
Utah |
40 |
Modified primary |
hyb |
1567 |
|
April 5, 2016 |
Wisconsin |
42 |
Open primary |
w-t-all |
1609 |
April 19, 2016 |
New York |
95 |
Closed primary |
hyb |
1704 |
April 26, 2016 |
Connecticut |
28 |
Closed primary |
hyb |
1732 |
Delaware |
16 |
Closed primary |
w-t-all |
1748 |
|
Maryland |
38 |
Closed primary |
w-t-all |
1786 |
|
Pennsylvania |
71 |
Closed primary |
w-t-all |
1857 |
|
Rhode Island |
19 |
Modified primary |
prop |
1876 |
|
May 3, 2016 |
Indiana |
57 |
Open primary |
w-t-all |
1933 |
May 10, 2016 |
Nebraska |
36 |
Semi-closed primary |
w-t-all |
1969 |
West Virginia |
34 |
Modified primary |
hyb |
2003 |
|
May 17, 2016 |
Oregon |
28 |
Closed primary |
prop |
2031 |
May 24, 2016 |
Washington |
44 |
Closed primary |
prop |
2075 |
June 7, 2016 |
California |
172 |
Closed primary |
w-t-all |
2247 |
Montana |
27 |
Closed caucus |
w-t-all |
2274 |
|
New Jersey |
51 |
Modified primary |
w-t-all |
2325 |
|
New Mexico |
24 |
Closed primary |
prop |
2349 |
|
South Dakota |
29 |
Closed primary |
w-t-all |
2378 |
|
TBA |
North Dakota |
28 |
Closed caucus |
||
TBA |
Colorado |
37 |
Closed caucus |
||
TBA |
American Samoa |
9 |
Open caucus |
||
TBA |
Northern Marianas |
9 |
Closed caucus |
w-t-all |
|
TBA |
Virgin Islands |
9 |
Closed caucus |
w-t-all |
prop = proportional
hyb = hybrid, a mixture of proportional and winner take most
w-t-all = winner take all
RE: 29 of 30 Nevada delegates.
It depends on which source you look at. They do not all report the same numbers, for some reason.
According to thegreenpapers.com, NV delegates are:
Trump 14
Rubio 7
Cruz 6
Carson 2
Kasich 1
Is this not symbolic?
Delegates may vote for anyone they wish (unless legally bound to vote for someone).
The last time it was an issue I think, was 1976 Democrat. Mo Udall had his name placed in nomination, then released his delegates.
The chairwoman first ruled that Mo had withdrawn, then after some boos from the Udall delegates, agreed that Udall’s name had been placed in nomination.
So far as I know, it is possible to secure the nomination (receive a majority vote of delegates) without having your name placed in nomination.
I suppose if you do not have 8 delegations then you don’t get a nominating speech and you don’t get a seconding speech.
You’re right. my eyes must be failing. I have family in politics in LV, I am going to ask one of them.
That means the Voters vote was stolen.
The party of stupid thinks the people who voted got Trump will be ok with it?
The Democrats will have the Souse, Senate and Presidency
I assume the presumptive nominee gets his delegates to affirm they will vote for his pick of running mate, and turns that into the secretary.
I do think that Cruz will be done as well as Rubio by the time the convention rolls around.
....And BIG revolt on their hands.
Post 51 cites a source that has Carson at 2 instead of 1.
Perhaps the Gang of Eight killed the Rule of Eight for Rubio.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.