Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Trump the Vacillator in Chief
Townhall.com ^ | February 26, 2016 | Michael Brown

Posted on 02/26/2016 8:10:18 AM PST by Kaslin

If Donald Trump ends up being our next president, I will pray that he will be the greatest president we have ever had and I will fervently hope that I'm absolutely wrong about all of my concerns. Until then (or at least until we decide on the Republican nominee), I will sound the alarm and raise my voice as loudly and clearly as I can.

Do not be duped by Donald Trump!

The issue is not whether he's a true Christian.

The issue is whether he can be trusted and whether we even know what his real positions are.

So I ask you, if you are a Trump supporter, with all respect for your zeal and with affirmation of your frustration with status-quo politics, how can you know what Trump really believes or what he will actually do if elected?

He changes his views from one day to the next - sometimes diametrically - and flatly contradicts his previous positions, then insults and mocks those who challenge him, often in the most puerile ways. No other candidate in memory - perhaps in our nation's history - has vacillated so wildly and dramatically in such a short period of time.

Trump truly is the vacillator-in-chief.

Let's remember that we're talking about who will be the next president of the United States, arguably the most powerful person in the world, so this is not the time for blind loyalty. The stakes are very high.

Please look at the facts honestly, and if you have the courage, look at them through the eyes of a critic or skeptic.

Last week on MSNBC, when pressed by Joe Scarborough, he pledged to stay neutral on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict until elected president, not only an ambiguous answer but a weak answer. Less than seven days later, speaking at Regent University, he pledged "100% support" for Israel.

Which position, if either is true? What will Trump do if elected? Who knows?

And is it at all curious that on the infamously liberal MSNBC, hardly a pro-Israel bastion, Trump would not openly stand with Israel, while at the famously pro-Israel Regent University, he promised to stand with Israel?

Trump is either lying or vacillating or both, but either way, he's untrustworthy.

Earlier this month, when asked by Chris Wallace on Fox News if he would nominate Supreme Court justices who supported overturning the Obergefell decision which redefined marriage, Trump said he would "strongly consider" it. Less than one week later, he assured a lesbian reporter that under his administration, there would be great progress for LGBT Americans.

When pressed by ABC's George Stephanopoulos as to how both of these positions could be true at the same time, he answered (to paraphrase), "Well, it's a long way off, George, but trust me. We're going to have great judges and everybody will love them."

This prompted the gay, PinkNews website to opine, "It's all very clear: if you're a lesbian voter he will support your marriage, but if you're an evangelical voter he'll oppose lesbian marriage. If you ask on Fox News then he will absolutely consider it, but if you ask on NBC then he hasn't decided whether he will decide to decide yet."

Trump also vacillated wildly when asked whether his sister (of pro-partial birth abortion fame) should be nominated as a Supreme Court justice including: yes; no; I was joking; I wasn't joking; I have no idea what she believes. (This is a partial, very rough summary.) Then add to the mix that, in 2000 he said there should be no abortion litmus test for federal judges.

And the list goes on and on, almost endlessly.

During Thursday night's debate, Leon Wolf tweeted this quote from Trump: "I have great respect for Justice Scalia," followed by, "Trump Less than 5 months ago . . . slammed Scalia for not supporting affirmative action."

Others called him out during the debating for reversing his position on Libya's Qaddafi, contrasting his remarks in the debate ("[Cruz is] saying I was in favor of Libya? I never discussed that subject. I was in favor of Libya? We would be so much better off if Gadhafi were in charge right now.") with his 2011 comments that, "Now we should go in, we should stop this guy which would be very easy and very quick. We could do it surgically, stop him from doing it, and save these lives."

So, not only did he deny ever discussing the subject - either an outright lie or an example of a terrible memory - but he also reversed his earlier position.

Then there are his contradictory statements on government funded health-care, Planned Parenthood, and a host of other important subjects.

As Dr. Bunsen Honeydew (@DunsScottus) tweeted during the debate, "Trump is actually just Sanders in a toupee. 'I'm gonna give you coverage for pre-existing conditions but no individual mandate.' Magic!”

Not surprisingly, immediately after the debate, the Cruz campaign released a video from the debate, where, in answer to Cruz's "true or false" question, Trump said it was "false" that he ever said that the government should pay for everyone's health care. This was followed by a clip from Trump's September 27, 2015, 60 Minutes interview in which he stated emphatically that, "The government's gonna pay for it."

Speaking of Cruz, let's not forget Trump's vacillating comments on him, ranging from: he's "a little bit of a maniac" to "he has a wonderful temperament, he's just fine, don't worry about it," back to he's a "Very nasty guy," a "total hypocrite," a "liar," and "a very unstable guy" (all in the course of a month).

And we can't leave out his statements on Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State, going from: "I think she really works hard and I think she does a good job. I like her" (2012), to: "worst Secretary of State in the history of the United States" (2016).

Shall we also mention Trump's completely absurd statements, such as his suggestion after the debate that "maybe" he's being audited because he's "a strong Christian"?

Or what of Trump's righteous indignation over former Mexican president Vincente Fox that Mexico is "not going to pay" for that "f----ing wall?” He said to Wolf Blitzer during the debate, "This guy used a filthy, disgusting word on television, and he should be ashamed of himself, and he should apologize, OK?" And he said this with a straight face.

And in a post-debate interview with Chris Cuomo he actually said, "And I could tell you I would not use that word, but if I did use that word, uh, I probably wouldn't have even been allowed on the stage tonight."

This prompted Cuomo to laughingly respond, "You do understand there's a touch of irony in that . . . ." To say the least!

What's really sad, though, is the response from his supporters, even when he's exposed.

I posted this on my Facebook page after the debate: "Come on Trump supporters! Wake up and face reality. You cannot believe what this man says -- unless you really believe he's being audited because he's a strong Christian. Stop drinking the Kool-Aid!"

Trump supporters responded with gems like these:

"Ur a moron and as evil as Obama is."

"U DONT HAVE A CLUE... TRUMP 100 %... we need a strong man and he is all we have... Christian or not... that is not your call... lol...and who are U...or who do U think U R... an old joke..."

"Gooo TRUMP!!! Please stop the bashing thank u"

"And ur a Christian. U prove my point because ur not just a money hog or prob will burn in hell Ur a Christian. Hahaha. Maybe so is Obama Yep same cockroaches"

"You are a Christian leader on here attacking us on you're site??? Way uncool?? What other Christian leaders would do this??? Report this site and delete!! U don't need to be rude!! Not a Christian at all."

And there was this truly insightful comment: "I spoke to a Trump supporter today and he told me, 'it's part of life to flip flop on issues because your learning new things every day.'" Unreal.

One day earlier, I had conducted a poll on Twitter in which the vast majority of those who responded said that, of Trump, Cruz, Rubio, or Carson, it was Trump who was the least honest. In response to this, the "Trump Revolution" tweeted back, "Bad poll. Trump is the most honest!"

@DrMichaelLBrown @CaraKeith22 Bad poll. Trump is the most honest! ??????— Trump Revolution (@organic2016) February 26, 2016

As I said two weeks ago, Trump could say he's been lying all along and his supporters would commend him for his honesty.

And so, Trump can decisively lose a debate to Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz with headlines proclaiming, "Donald Trump Was Badly Exposed," yet his followers, who apparently dominate Drudge Report, can crown him the overwhelming victor. (When checked at 3:00 AM, EST, the Drudge voters gave Trump 60% of the vote with a combined 34% going to Cruz and Rubio.)

May I make one more appeal for sober reflection and sanity?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: artofthecon; artofthefraud; downticket; trump; trumpsbaggage; trumpu; trumpuniversity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: heights

Have done some ‘google searches’ for that and nothing.

Would you have a link or source?

Thanks.


41 posted on 02/26/2016 8:38:32 AM PST by pilgrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Thanks for sharing your opinion Michael Brown. Please don't be offended when I reject your opinion. I am pleased that you will join in supporting him if he becomes the President and your stated desire that he become one of the greatest. Hopefully you are genuine with this sentiment, but really how can one be sure.

As to why he wouldn't state his support for Israel on MSNBC's Joe Scarborough show, it may have been nothing more than timing holding him back on his support until he spoke at the famously pro-Israel Regent University. To you that is vacillation, when in reality it may have been just a matter of timing. At least he hadn't the week before thrown his support to Palestine. That clearly would have been vacillation.

It's true he has vacillated on other issues, but others have as well. While I don't give him a pass, neither do I hold it against him. He is like many other politicians who try to play both sides of the coin. At least he is no good at it, so which side he truly supports is impossible to determine.

Bottom line support your candidate and I will support mine. So instead of telling us you don't know what Donald Trump really stands for, since we already know that, tell us why you support Ted Cruz.

42 posted on 02/26/2016 8:40:37 AM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup
And Cruz supporters now will run to Rubio just as BusTed has announced.

Maybe the ones here on FR, but not the majority out in America.
43 posted on 02/26/2016 8:41:16 AM PST by JoSixChip (Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - He's creepy and he's kooky, mysterious and spooky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Well, it looks like Cruz is throwing in with amnesty boy Rubio over Trump.

This is exactly why Cruz can't be trusted to be the principled conservative he claims to be.

44 posted on 02/26/2016 8:46:37 AM PST by The Iceman Cometh (Ted Cruz & Marco Rubio - Amnesty Pimps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

45 posted on 02/26/2016 8:47:04 AM PST by The Iceman Cometh (Ted Cruz & Marco Rubio - Amnesty Pimps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh

Is that a school mascot?
LOL


46 posted on 02/26/2016 8:48:12 AM PST by nascarnation (RIP Scalia. Godspeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: austingirl

LOL. Yes you’re right. What is the difference between “Hope and change” and “it will be amazing”. Has Trump promised a “fundamental transformation” yet??


47 posted on 02/26/2016 8:49:01 AM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
Is that a school mascot?

It's Count Chocula.


48 posted on 02/26/2016 8:50:39 AM PST by The Iceman Cometh (Ted Cruz & Marco Rubio - Amnesty Pimps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh

LOL thanks!


49 posted on 02/26/2016 8:51:52 AM PST by nascarnation (RIP Scalia. Godspeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh
Not even close.

Come on now, you gotta admit Walter is spot on for Trump.

50 posted on 02/26/2016 8:54:00 AM PST by TexasCajun (#BlackViolenceMatters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

That was stated elsewhere and asked the poster for a source for his premise. Nothing so far, would ask you.

Have done some ‘google searches’ for that and nothing.

Would you have a link or source?

Thanks.


51 posted on 02/26/2016 8:54:05 AM PST by pilgrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
Come on now, you gotta admit Walter is spot on for Trump.

Using a bald guy to compare to Trump is a complete abomination to Trump considering the history of hair jokes and memes Trump has racked up.

Absolute failure.

52 posted on 02/26/2016 8:56:43 AM PST by The Iceman Cometh (Ted Cruz & Marco Rubio - Amnesty Pimps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

“You all so busy looking for that line or word you can freak out at Trump about you never bothered actually LISTENING to him”

I’ve listened to Trump and his followers, yes, Trump vacillates and apparently it’s his followers who aren’t listening to him. There are many reasons to support Senator Cruz and many reasons not to support Trump but among the most important reasons to not support Trump is that he is mentally unstable and has a personality disorder.

“Trump recently called Senator Cruz “unstable”, the following is my thoughts on that. While I certainly don’t want Bernie or Hillary I don’t see where we would be any better with Trump, when you consider his past positions and his personality. What we are mad at the GOP-e for is their “deal making”, negotiating with democrats, and not being Conservative. Why support an unknown quantity when you have a sane Constitutional Conservative who went to DC and did what he said he would do? Too many of our “conservative” Republicans apparently use the term “conservative” only as an obligatory campaign slogan. I do not believe Trump is Conservative or a pragmatist, I believe he’s a big government liberal democrat at heart will say or do anything to get elected.

Trump saying senator Cruz is unstable? This is another case of Trump attacking Senator Cruz for his own, Trump’s, problems. I believe Donald Trump is an extreme narcissists, more extreme than obama. The symptoms the Donald exhibits? Excessive use of superlatives instead of factual information, listen to him describe what he will replace obamacare with. Lack of empathy exhibited by mocking the afflicted and childish name calling. Not to mention his vindictiveness and rages. A narcissist will surround himself with two kinds of people those who pump him up and those he can put down. Trump should not be making Supreme Court or any other appointments, taking those 3am phone calls or have his finger anywhere near the button. And he calls Senator Cruz a liar and unstable.”


53 posted on 02/26/2016 8:57:43 AM PST by duffee (CRUZ 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: optiguy

So then all the criticism of Gang of 8 means nothing.

That is a Great Conswervative indeed!


54 posted on 02/26/2016 8:58:12 AM PST by samtheman (Vote Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lopeover

Great link. Thanks for posting.

http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=296&mn=17577&pt=msg&mid=15791036

“Political elite glass should be flipping grateful this is a bloodless revolution!”

They all start this way...bloodless until the “Little Father” turns the Cossacks loose with the Maxims.


55 posted on 02/26/2016 8:58:33 AM PST by Lowell1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Not everyone favors a liberal over a Rino. Lesser of two evils.


56 posted on 02/26/2016 9:05:26 AM PST by optiguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: optiguy

So all the criticism of the Gang of 8 means nothing, when we come right down to it?

Immigration just isnt that important to Cruz after all, when we come right down to it?


57 posted on 02/26/2016 9:06:53 AM PST by samtheman (Vote Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh
Well, you got a point, Walter doesn't have a silly-looking comb-over from the back of his head.

However, the sulking expression is on mark.

58 posted on 02/26/2016 9:07:05 AM PST by TexasCajun (#BlackViolenceMatters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: optiguy

“When did he say he would endorse Rubio? I heard him say he prefers Rubio over Trump. Between the three, there is only one who was opposing conservatives with his endorsements of and donations to liberals and rinos. He was doing this while we conservatives were showing up and donating to true conservatives. He worked HARD to defeat true conservatives. You support the liar.”

Senator Cruz has also at other debates said “anyone on this stage would be better than Clinton.” As for myself I don’t believe there would be that much difference in hillary, bernie or Trump. Trump will very likely revert back as he’s “deal making” and say the situation has changed again. And the there’s the question of Trump’s mental stability and his personality disorder and the effect these would have on the Presidency.


59 posted on 02/26/2016 9:08:23 AM PST by duffee (CRUZ 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
Well, you got a point, Walter doesn't have a silly-looking comb-over from the back of his head.

Damn right I have a point. How can you mock Trump if you don't have some ridiculous hair going on. At least Count Chocula and Ted Cruz share an ugly nose, fat chin and stupid eyebrows.

Sheesh, put a little more effort into bashing Trump.

60 posted on 02/26/2016 9:10:46 AM PST by The Iceman Cometh (Ted Cruz & Marco Rubio - Amnesty Pimps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson