Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fai Mao

Considering that full automatic rifles (also known as machine guns) are already banned with the exception of a special 4th Amendment waiver for the weapon— there is no need to “ban” them. They already are quite specifically forbidden and have been since 1934.


34 posted on 02/25/2016 5:14:10 PM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: John S Mosby

“Considering that full automatic rifles (also known as machine guns) are already banned “

That statement is not true

This reply is thanks to the FReeper NFHale:

No, they’re not. Full auto firearms are not “illegal nearly everywhere” - they’re Class III NFA firearms that have to be registered, and you need a 200.00 dollar tax transfer stamp to own or transfer them. They’re completely legal in 40+ states. Similar situation with suppressors (or “silencers”, which is a misleading term).

RE “...banning something that is already banned...”

They’re not “banned”. They’re heavily regulated, and expensive, but they’re certainly not banned, except in a very few states.


36 posted on 02/25/2016 5:37:35 PM PST by Fai Mao (Just a tropical gardiner chatting with friends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson