You keep repeating the same tired erroneous claims. Of course I keep rebutting them. . . and I will continue correcting your claims.
I am still waiting for the exact English, Legal words from the Court Order that state that Apple gets to KEEP the SUBJECT DEVICE after it loads the modified operating system to allow the government unlimited brute force passcode tries without erasing the data. You are still stone-walling publishing your answer, claiming you already posted it. You assert it's obvious it does, I state factually there is no such language in the court order and quoted the Court Order verbatim. Prove your assertion. The burden of proof is on you.
May or may not have been posted, Apple’s Motion to Vacate: