Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp; SteveH; itsahoot; IncPen; Protect the Bill of Rights; JimSEA; Mark17; SgtHooper; ...
What *I* see, is him repeating himself regarding arguments I have already shown (at least to me) as irrelevant or just plain wrong.

You keep repeating the same tired erroneous claims. Of course I keep rebutting them. . . and I will continue correcting your claims.

I am still waiting for the exact English, Legal words from the Court Order that state that Apple gets to KEEP the SUBJECT DEVICE after it loads the modified operating system to allow the government unlimited brute force passcode tries without erasing the data. You are still stone-walling publishing your answer, claiming you already posted it. You assert it's obvious it does, I state factually there is no such language in the court order and quoted the Court Order verbatim. Prove your assertion. The burden of proof is on you.

163 posted on 02/25/2016 1:37:01 PM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users contIinue....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker

May or may not have been posted, Apple’s Motion to Vacate:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2722196-Motion-to-Vacate-Brief-and-Supporting-Declarations.html


169 posted on 02/25/2016 1:58:52 PM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson